‘The New Bourdieu’: The Public Intellectual in the Shared Interventions of Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Derrida

This article presents a new account of the relationship between Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Derrida. Often presented in opposition to one another, I argue that their work together in the 1990s challenges this orthodox view. This article draws on their shared political engagements against repressive migration laws in France, which included co-founding institutions, writing shared newspaper articles and appearing together on radio and television. I propose that both use this collaboration to theorize the public intellectual anew. In their account of the intellectual, we see three primary characteristics: intellectuals should act collectively; intellectuals are part of a larger media ecology; and intellectuals should refer to universal ideas. I argue that their collaboration is underpinned by a common conception of the universal as historically mediated, but nevertheless a critical reference point for academic and intellectual work. Ultimately, I argue that the intersection in their work points to a need to reconceive the dividing lines in our accounts of post-1960s French philosophy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2025.2519267
Primary Topic
Social and Cultural Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘The New Bourdieu’: The Public Intellectual in the Shared Interventions of Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Derrida

Cillian Ó Fathaigh
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Social and Cultural Dynamics
article

‘The New Bourdieu’: The Public Intellectual in the Shared Interventions of Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Derrida

Cillian Ó Fathaigh
article en

Abstract

This article presents a new account of the relationship between Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Derrida. Often presented in opposition to one another, I argue that their work together in the 1990s challenges this orthodox view. This article draws on their shared political engagements against repressive migration laws in France, which included co-founding institutions, writing shared newspaper articles and appearing together on radio and television. I propose that both use this collaboration to theorize the public intellectual anew. In their account of the intellectual, we see three primary characteristics: intellectuals should act collectively; intellectuals are part of a larger media ecology; and intellectuals should refer to universal ideas. I argue that their collaboration is underpinned by a common conception of the universal as historically mediated, but nevertheless a critical reference point for academic and intellectual work. Ultimately, I argue that the intersection in their work points to a need to reconceive the dividing lines in our accounts of post-1960s French philosophy.

International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Social and Cultural Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘The New Bourdieu’: The Public Intellectual in the Shared Interventions of Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Derrida — Cillian Ó Fathaigh · International Journal of Philosophical Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS