The power of perception: How scientific experts’ understanding of media logic affects their media-related behavior

During the COVID-19 pandemic, journalists were heavily reliant on contributions from scientific experts. Despite the often productive collaboration between scientists and journalists, journalistic practices are largely at odds with scientific routines, making scientists not always willing to act as experts in the news media. Against the background of mediatization theory, we argue that their willingness to play by the media rules depends to a large extent on their assessment and understanding of how the news media work. Through in-depth interviews with 24 Austrian scientific experts, we investigated what they perceive as news media logic and how this shapes their responses to media requests. Interviewees exhibited a reflective understanding of news media logic. Findings suggest that experts’ perceptions of how different media work not only affect their decision whether to reject or accept media requests. In addition, they also shape their individual preparation for media engagements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Communication and Media
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2025-2-203
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The power of perception: How scientific experts’ understanding of media logic affects their media-related behavior

Daniel Nölleke, Birte Leonhardt, Folker Hanusch
1 citations
Studies in Communication and Media
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

The power of perception: How scientific experts’ understanding of media logic affects their media-related behavior

Daniel Nölleke, Birte Leonhardt, Folker Hanusch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, journalists were heavily reliant on contributions from scientific experts. Despite the often productive collaboration between scientists and journalists, journalistic practices are largely at odds with scientific routines, making scientists not always willing to act as experts in the news media. Against the background of mediatization theory, we argue that their willingness to play by the media rules depends to a large extent on their assessment and understanding of how the news media work. Through in-depth interviews with 24 Austrian scientific experts, we investigated what they perceive as news media logic and how this shapes their responses to media requests. Interviewees exhibited a reflective understanding of news media logic. Findings suggest that experts’ perceptions of how different media work not only affect their decision whether to reject or accept media requests. In addition, they also shape their individual preparation for media engagements.

Studies in Communication and MediaVol. 14(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.