Considering Confucian, Buddhist, and Taoist influences on daily emotion regulation and affect in Chinese Australian trauma survivors

<b>ABSTRACT</b><b>Background:</b> Confucianist, Buddhist and Taoist teachings offer insight into emotion processing for members of East Asian cultures. Emerging research also suggests distinguishing Confucianism into restrictive (focused on restricting self-needs for the greater good), and empowering (emphasising self-improvement) facets, and this distinction may be relevant for emotional processes. However, research has not considered how endorsement of these teachings influence emotion regulation among East Asian trauma survivors.<b>Objective:</b> This study presents a secondary analysis from a larger study on cultural differences in emotion regulation, and explored how levels of adherence to these teachings influence daily emotion regulation and affective outcomes among Chinese Australian trauma survivors.<b>Method:</b> Chinese Australian trauma survivors (<i>n</i> = 49) completed a baseline questionnaire assessing trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology and endorsement of Confucianism (restrictive and empowering), Buddhism, and Taoism. Participants then completed ecological momentary assessments (EMA) measuring daily use of suppression, acceptance and interpersonal emotion regulation and both positive and negative affect over seven days.<b>Results:</b> First, Taoism was positively associated with the use of daily acceptance, and Buddhism was positively associated with daily use of interpersonal emotion regulation. Second, Taoism moderated the positive relationship between acceptance and positive affect, whereby the strength of this association increased as Taoism endorsement increased. Taoism also moderated the relationship between interpersonal emotion regulation and both positive and negative affect, such that the associations were only significant for participants with higher levels of Taoism. Both restrictive and empowering Confucianism also moderated the negative association between acceptance and negative affect, with this association only being significant for individuals with low levels of empowering Confucianism and high levels of restrictive Confucianism.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings provide preliminary indications that the Three Teachings of East Asia may influence emotion regulation and associated affective outcomes among Chinese trauma survivors, highlighting a need for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2518813
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering Confucian, Buddhist, and Taoist influences on daily emotion regulation and affect in Chinese Australian trauma survivors

Belinda J. Liddell, Richard Allan Bryant, Winnie Lau, July Lies et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
4.61
article

Considering Confucian, Buddhist, and Taoist influences on daily emotion regulation and affect in Chinese Australian trauma survivors

Belinda J. Liddell, Richard Allan Bryant, Winnie Lau, July Lies, Asami Koike, Laura Jobson, Maode Lai, Haoxiang Li, Joshua Wong, Larissa Shiying Qiu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>ABSTRACT</b><b>Background:</b> Confucianist, Buddhist and Taoist teachings offer insight into emotion processing for members of East Asian cultures. Emerging research also suggests distinguishing Confucianism into restrictive (focused on restricting self-needs for the greater good), and empowering (emphasising self-improvement) facets, and this distinction may be relevant for emotional processes. However, research has not considered how endorsement of these teachings influence emotion regulation among East Asian trauma survivors.<b>Objective:</b> This study presents a secondary analysis from a larger study on cultural differences in emotion regulation, and explored how levels of adherence to these teachings influence daily emotion regulation and affective outcomes among Chinese Australian trauma survivors.<b>Method:</b> Chinese Australian trauma survivors (<i>n</i> = 49) completed a baseline questionnaire assessing trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology and endorsement of Confucianism (restrictive and empowering), Buddhism, and Taoism. Participants then completed ecological momentary assessments (EMA) measuring daily use of suppression, acceptance and interpersonal emotion regulation and both positive and negative affect over seven days.<b>Results:</b> First, Taoism was positively associated with the use of daily acceptance, and Buddhism was positively associated with daily use of interpersonal emotion regulation. Second, Taoism moderated the positive relationship between acceptance and positive affect, whereby the strength of this association increased as Taoism endorsement increased. Taoism also moderated the relationship between interpersonal emotion regulation and both positive and negative affect, such that the associations were only significant for participants with higher levels of Taoism. Both restrictive and empowering Confucianism also moderated the negative association between acceptance and negative affect, with this association only being significant for individuals with low levels of empowering Confucianism and high levels of restrictive Confucianism.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings provide preliminary indications that the Three Teachings of East Asia may influence emotion regulation and associated affective outcomes among Chinese trauma survivors, highlighting a need for further research.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 16(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), ShapeSpace (United Kingdom) (GB), Monash University (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.