Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks for Modeling Spatially Distributed Dynamically Operated Processes

Modeling process systems by use of partial differential equations is often complex and computationally expensive, especially for inverse problems such as optimization, state identification, or parameter estimation. Data-driven methods typically provide efficient alternatives with lower computational cost. One such method is Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), which can be used to model dynamical systems as graphs. However, dynamic GNNs often face challenges with extrapolation and representability. Integrating mechanistic insights in surrogate models can improve both prediction accuracy and interpretability. This study compares different strategies for embedding physics-based insights into GNNs to model the dynamic behavior of a catalytic CO2 methanation reactor. The hybrid integration of physics-informed GNNs aims to improve the predictive ability and interpretability while reducing the model development time, thereby facilitating faster deployment. Results show that penalizing the predicted change in reactor states from one time step to the next during training reduces the Frobenius error norm of GNN predictions from about 2.2�% to 1.4�%. In contrast, using a traditional physics-based loss function during training results in a Frobenius norm as high as 8.7�%. This highlights the importance of comparing different strategies for embedding physical laws into data-driven models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems and Control Transactions
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.101576
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks for Modeling Spatially Distributed Dynamically Operated Processes

Kai Sundmacher, Edgar Iván Sánchez Medina, Md Meraj Khalid, Luisa Peterson
Systems and Control Transactions
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks for Modeling Spatially Distributed Dynamically Operated Processes

Kai Sundmacher, Edgar Iván Sánchez Medina, Md Meraj Khalid, Luisa Peterson
article en

Abstract

Modeling process systems by use of partial differential equations is often complex and computationally expensive, especially for inverse problems such as optimization, state identification, or parameter estimation. Data-driven methods typically provide efficient alternatives with lower computational cost. One such method is Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), which can be used to model dynamical systems as graphs. However, dynamic GNNs often face challenges with extrapolation and representability. Integrating mechanistic insights in surrogate models can improve both prediction accuracy and interpretability. This study compares different strategies for embedding physics-based insights into GNNs to model the dynamic behavior of a catalytic CO2 methanation reactor. The hybrid integration of physics-informed GNNs aims to improve the predictive ability and interpretability while reducing the model development time, thereby facilitating faster deployment. Results show that penalizing the predicted change in reactor states from one time step to the next during training reduces the Frobenius error norm of GNN predictions from about 2.2�% to 1.4�%. In contrast, using a traditional physics-based loss function during training results in a Frobenius norm as high as 8.7�%. This highlights the importance of comparing different strategies for embedding physical laws into data-driven models.

Systems and Control TransactionsVol. 4
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering, Projektträger Jülich
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.