Correlation between spark plug electrode gap and engine performance-emission characteristics in a single-cylinder petrol engine

In this study, we conducted an experimental investigation into how five different sparks plug ground electrode gap settings (0.5 mm, 0.75 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.25 mm, and 1.5 mm) affect the performance and exhaust emissions of a single-cylinder petrol engine. The experiments were conducted on a single-cylinder, four-stroke spark-ignition engine operated at constant speed and throttle, with a stoichiometric air–fuel mixture, and instrumented for in-cylinder pressure and full exhaust emission analysis. Key performance metrics including brake mean effective pressure (BMEP), brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), and exhaust gas temperature (EGT) were assessed, along with exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NOx). The engine was operated at a constant speed and throttled with stoichiometric mixture to isolate the influence of spark gap. Among the tested configurations, the 1.0 mm spark gap delivered the best performance, achieving a peak brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) of 7.2 bar and the lowest BSFC of ~300 g/kWh. Emissions of CO and HC followed a U-shaped trend, minimizing at the 1.0 mm gap (CO: 0.48%, HC: 300 ppm), while NOx peaked at this same setting (~2000 ppm) due to elevated flame temperatures. Wider gaps (1.5 mm) induced partial misfires, resulting in increased CO and HC emissions and a 17% drop in BMEP. The results confirm that spark gap size strongly influences combustion quality, and the optimal range of 0.9–1.0 mm offers a practical trade-off between efficiency and emissions. Smaller or larger gaps caused deteriorated performance: a narrow 0.5 mm gap produced weaker ignition leading to slower combustion, while an overly wide 1.5 mm gap caused partial misfires. Consequently, CO and HC emissions followed a U-shaped trend, minimizing at the ~1.0 mm gap and rising at the extreme small and large gaps because of incomplete combustion at those conditions. In contrast, NOx emissions were the lowest at the smallest and largest gaps and peaked at the mid-gap, inversely tracking the combustion efficiency and peak temperature trends. It was concluded that a larger spark gap improves the initial flame kernel and combustion stability up to a point, beyond which ignition becomes erratic. The optimal spark plug gap ~0.9–1.0 mm achieved the best trade-off between complete combustion (low CO/HC) and high thermal efficiency/BMEP, at the cost of increased NOx because of higher combustion temperatures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1671992
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation between spark plug electrode gap and engine performance-emission characteristics in a single-cylinder petrol engine

Özlem Erdem Yılmaz, Ali Can Yılmaz
International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
article

Correlation between spark plug electrode gap and engine performance-emission characteristics in a single-cylinder petrol engine

Özlem Erdem Yılmaz, Ali Can Yılmaz
article en

Abstract

In this study, we conducted an experimental investigation into how five different sparks plug ground electrode gap settings (0.5 mm, 0.75 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.25 mm, and 1.5 mm) affect the performance and exhaust emissions of a single-cylinder petrol engine. The experiments were conducted on a single-cylinder, four-stroke spark-ignition engine operated at constant speed and throttle, with a stoichiometric air–fuel mixture, and instrumented for in-cylinder pressure and full exhaust emission analysis. Key performance metrics including brake mean effective pressure (BMEP), brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), and exhaust gas temperature (EGT) were assessed, along with exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NOx). The engine was operated at a constant speed and throttled with stoichiometric mixture to isolate the influence of spark gap. Among the tested configurations, the 1.0 mm spark gap delivered the best performance, achieving a peak brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) of 7.2 bar and the lowest BSFC of ~300 g/kWh. Emissions of CO and HC followed a U-shaped trend, minimizing at the 1.0 mm gap (CO: 0.48%, HC: 300 ppm), while NOx peaked at this same setting (~2000 ppm) due to elevated flame temperatures. Wider gaps (1.5 mm) induced partial misfires, resulting in increased CO and HC emissions and a 17% drop in BMEP. The results confirm that spark gap size strongly influences combustion quality, and the optimal range of 0.9–1.0 mm offers a practical trade-off between efficiency and emissions. Smaller or larger gaps caused deteriorated performance: a narrow 0.5 mm gap produced weaker ignition leading to slower combustion, while an overly wide 1.5 mm gap caused partial misfires. Consequently, CO and HC emissions followed a U-shaped trend, minimizing at the ~1.0 mm gap and rising at the extreme small and large gaps because of incomplete combustion at those conditions. In contrast, NOx emissions were the lowest at the smallest and largest gaps and peaked at the mid-gap, inversely tracking the combustion efficiency and peak temperature trends. It was concluded that a larger spark gap improves the initial flame kernel and combustion stability up to a point, beyond which ignition becomes erratic. The optimal spark plug gap ~0.9–1.0 mm achieved the best trade-off between complete combustion (low CO/HC) and high thermal efficiency/BMEP, at the cost of increased NOx because of higher combustion temperatures.

International Journal of Automotive Engineering and TechnologiesVol. 14(2)
Cukurova University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.