Higher Saliva pH Among Vegetarians Compared With Nonvegetarians in Hong Kong

ABSTRACT Introduction An optimal salivary pH level above 5.5 is crucial for maintaining oral health and preventing tooth decay. Furthermore, oral health may correlate with a reduced risk of chronic conditions such as diabetes and heart disease. This cross‐sectional study aims to compare the differences in salivary pH levels between vegetarians and nonvegetarians. Methods During a vegetarian health festival in Hong Kong, we invited participants to complete a health questionnaire and measure their saliva pH 30 min after meals. Approximately 237 individuals volunteered for the study, consisting of 79 vegetarians and 158 nonvegetarians. Results An Independent Samples t‐ test showed that vegetarians exhibited a pH of 7.07, whereas nonvegetarians had a pH of 6.61 ( p < 0.001). The contrasting dietary patterns between the two groups indicated that vegetarians consumed a higher quantity of beans and nuts, while nonvegetarians favored meats and beverages such as coffee, sodas, and juices. In a distinct analysis independent of dietary categorization, foods linked with a higher pH level included beans and vegetables. Conclusion A higher saliva pH was observed in vegetarians compared to nonvegetarians. The primary component of the vegetarian diet potentially accounting for this difference is beans, which were found to be independently associated with elevated pH levels in our study. Furthermore, vegetables were also identified as foods contributing to this increase in pH. However, further experimental and longitudinal studies are required to validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lifestyle Medicine
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lim2.70030
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Higher Saliva pH Among Vegetarians Compared With Nonvegetarians in Hong Kong

Wenes Pereira Reis, Hildemar Dos Santos, Peter Chuk, Princess‐Lisa Cofie et al.
Lifestyle Medicine
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Higher Saliva pH Among Vegetarians Compared With Nonvegetarians in Hong Kong

Wenes Pereira Reis, Hildemar Dos Santos, Peter Chuk, Princess‐Lisa Cofie, Josileide Gaio, Alicia Carranza
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction An optimal salivary pH level above 5.5 is crucial for maintaining oral health and preventing tooth decay. Furthermore, oral health may correlate with a reduced risk of chronic conditions such as diabetes and heart disease. This cross‐sectional study aims to compare the differences in salivary pH levels between vegetarians and nonvegetarians. Methods During a vegetarian health festival in Hong Kong, we invited participants to complete a health questionnaire and measure their saliva pH 30 min after meals. Approximately 237 individuals volunteered for the study, consisting of 79 vegetarians and 158 nonvegetarians. Results An Independent Samples t‐ test showed that vegetarians exhibited a pH of 7.07, whereas nonvegetarians had a pH of 6.61 ( p < 0.001). The contrasting dietary patterns between the two groups indicated that vegetarians consumed a higher quantity of beans and nuts, while nonvegetarians favored meats and beverages such as coffee, sodas, and juices. In a distinct analysis independent of dietary categorization, foods linked with a higher pH level included beans and vegetables. Conclusion A higher saliva pH was observed in vegetarians compared to nonvegetarians. The primary component of the vegetarian diet potentially accounting for this difference is beans, which were found to be independently associated with elevated pH levels in our study. Furthermore, vegetables were also identified as foods contributing to this increase in pH. However, further experimental and longitudinal studies are required to validate these findings.

Lifestyle MedicineVol. 6(3)
Tung Wah College (HK), Loma Linda University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.