The Ways of The World (1753–56): Authorship, Irony, and the Essay-Periodical

ABSTRACT: Mainly known today for its role in the dispute over the Earl of Chesterfield's patronage (or otherwise) of Johnson's Dictionary , Robert Dodsley and Edward Moore's The World (1753–56) was one of the most successful single-essay periodicals of its day. This article presents a detailed account of the work, focusing especially on the critical and historical issues raised by its multiple authorship, essayistic tone, and elite associations. Turning to its early nineteenth-century afterlives, the article also assesses how The World 's trademark irony and titled contributors affected its standing at this key moment in the canonization of the classic essay serials.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Modern Language Review
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/mlr.00093
Primary Topic
Historical and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ways of The World (1753–56): Authorship, Irony, and the Essay-Periodical

Shaun Regan
The Modern Language Review
Historical and Literary Studies
article

The Ways of The World (1753–56): Authorship, Irony, and the Essay-Periodical

Shaun Regan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Mainly known today for its role in the dispute over the Earl of Chesterfield's patronage (or otherwise) of Johnson's Dictionary , Robert Dodsley and Edward Moore's The World (1753–56) was one of the most successful single-essay periodicals of its day. This article presents a detailed account of the work, focusing especially on the critical and historical issues raised by its multiple authorship, essayistic tone, and elite associations. Turning to its early nineteenth-century afterlives, the article also assesses how The World 's trademark irony and titled contributors affected its standing at this key moment in the canonization of the classic essay serials.

The Modern Language ReviewVol. 120(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Historical and Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.