New health taxes in Ghana: a qualitative study exploring potential public support

In the context of a fiscal crisis and health pressures, Ghana's government has been exploring additional pro-health taxes. The World Health Organization and World Bank support health taxes as 'win-win' policies that can, if designed effectively, simultaneously improve health and raise revenue for health spending. However, international evidence shows that health taxes can meet political and public opposition. Yet, there is little research that empirically examines public views of health taxes. We compared policy stakeholders' perceptions of Ghanaian public support for health taxes with public views, seeking to understand the basis for potential public opposition, the extent to which evidence can shape public views, and whether tax framing and design influences public support. We undertook 28 semi-structured key informant interviews with stakeholders (from government, advocacy, and business groups) and five focus groups with 38 members of the public (purposefully selected for diversity in gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, and social background). We employed an innovative deliberative design for the focus groups, which enabled us to explore how public views responded to contrasting health tax 'frames'. Stakeholders generally believed public support for health taxes was low, especially for more widely consumed products. Yet, most focus group participants expressed strong support for health taxes, especially those targeting (more widely-consumed) sugar-sweetened beverages. Support increased when health taxes were framed as measures to improve public health and/or create a fairer tax system, and when commitments were made to using resulting revenue for health spending (known as 'earmarking' or hypothecation). However, stakeholders and members of the public shared a concern that business influence in Ghanaian politics presents a key barrier to implementing effective health taxes sustainably. Overall, our findings suggest that health taxes with a clearly-framed health rationale could command strong Ghanaian public support but likely require effective advocacy to overcome political barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New health taxes in Ghana: a qualitative study exploring potential public support

Divine Darlington Logo, Katherine E. Smith, Mark Hellowell, Robert Marten et al.
1 citations
Health Policy and Planning
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
2.76
article

New health taxes in Ghana: a qualitative study exploring potential public support

Divine Darlington Logo, Katherine E. Smith, Mark Hellowell, Robert Marten, Arti Singh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the context of a fiscal crisis and health pressures, Ghana's government has been exploring additional pro-health taxes. The World Health Organization and World Bank support health taxes as 'win-win' policies that can, if designed effectively, simultaneously improve health and raise revenue for health spending. However, international evidence shows that health taxes can meet political and public opposition. Yet, there is little research that empirically examines public views of health taxes. We compared policy stakeholders' perceptions of Ghanaian public support for health taxes with public views, seeking to understand the basis for potential public opposition, the extent to which evidence can shape public views, and whether tax framing and design influences public support. We undertook 28 semi-structured key informant interviews with stakeholders (from government, advocacy, and business groups) and five focus groups with 38 members of the public (purposefully selected for diversity in gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, and social background). We employed an innovative deliberative design for the focus groups, which enabled us to explore how public views responded to contrasting health tax 'frames'. Stakeholders generally believed public support for health taxes was low, especially for more widely consumed products. Yet, most focus group participants expressed strong support for health taxes, especially those targeting (more widely-consumed) sugar-sweetened beverages. Support increased when health taxes were framed as measures to improve public health and/or create a fairer tax system, and when commitments were made to using resulting revenue for health spending (known as 'earmarking' or hypothecation). However, stakeholders and members of the public shared a concern that business influence in Ghanaian politics presents a key barrier to implementing effective health taxes sustainably. Overall, our findings suggest that health taxes with a clearly-framed health rationale could command strong Ghanaian public support but likely require effective advocacy to overcome political barriers.

Health Policy and PlanningVol. 40(8)
University of Strathclyde (GB), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), World Health Organization (CH), Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (CH), Ghana Health Service (GH), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.