Demand in mobile application markets and the role of top charts ranking

Abstract In mobile app markets, Top Charts are key recommendation systems, making higher-ranked apps more visible and reducing discovery costs for consumers. I exploit an instrumental variables approach to investigate how changes in app ranking position influence consumers' willingness to download apps. I then explore the impact of app visibility on consumer welfare by simulating scenarios in which the app ranking positions differ from the observed ones. Whilst theory predicts that, if app store rankings were solely determined by factors that correlate strongly with consumer utility, any reordering should lead to welfare losses, this study finds that on Google's Play Store certain changes in ranking position leads to positive welfare gains, suggesting that Google's current ranking system may be based on metrics that do not fully align with consumer preferences. These results contribute to the antitrust and regulatory debate on platforms' influence on consumer behaviour through recommendation systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpaf045
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demand in mobile application markets and the role of top charts ranking

Benedetta Gianola
Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
article

Demand in mobile application markets and the role of top charts ranking

Benedetta Gianola
article en

Abstract

Abstract In mobile app markets, Top Charts are key recommendation systems, making higher-ranked apps more visible and reducing discovery costs for consumers. I exploit an instrumental variables approach to investigate how changes in app ranking position influence consumers' willingness to download apps. I then explore the impact of app visibility on consumer welfare by simulating scenarios in which the app ranking positions differ from the observed ones. Whilst theory predicts that, if app store rankings were solely determined by factors that correlate strongly with consumer utility, any reordering should lead to welfare losses, this study finds that on Google's Play Store certain changes in ranking position leads to positive welfare gains, suggesting that Google's current ranking system may be based on metrics that do not fully align with consumer preferences. These results contribute to the antitrust and regulatory debate on platforms' influence on consumer behaviour through recommendation systems.

Journal of European Competition Law & PracticeVol. 16(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.