Contrasting User Benefit Baskets and Provider Payment Options Seeking National Social Health Insurance Choices in Selected Districts for Sierra Leone

In this article, we examine the healthcare potential of the relationship between User/ Benefit Baskets (BB) and Provider/ Payment Options (PO) evolving in six (6) Regional Districts in Sierra Leone, an emerging country in West Africa, and detail how components of Benefit Baskets and Payment Options can impact the nature and scope of implementing a National Social Health Insurance Program in Sierra Leone. Identified and perceived relationships, as revealed by a cross-sectional study, are presented with contextual data from users and providers in the respective six districts. Quantitative data was collected (from August to December 2019) for this research study using a semi-structured questionnaire with a sample size of 1,503 respondents made up of 1,185 household heads and 318 healthcare providers. Data collection, which began during 2019, was analyzed into essential descriptive and inferential statistics. Statistical analysis was run at a significant 5% level using Stata vs 14.0 software. Our results reveal that factors such as marital status, religion, occupation, monthly income, and the district of residents in Sierra Leone were more likely to influence the magnitude of contributions for the content of a User/ Benefit Basket. In contrast, the selection of a Provider/ Payment Option by healthcare providers – such as Diagnostic-Related Grouping (DRG) and Fees-for-Service (FFS), were more likely to be influenced by the level of care provided by the healthcare providers and by the Regional District in which the service providers were situated and operated. Based on our findings, key contextual factors are most likely to influence the content of BBs and POs in Sierra Leone. Hence, we submit that it is appropriate for such contextual factors associated with BBs and POs to be adequately and rigorously considered upon the implementation of a National Social Health Insurance Program for the people of Sierra Leone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20251002.17
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting User Benefit Baskets and Provider Payment Options Seeking National Social Health Insurance Choices in Selected Districts for Sierra Leone

Hassan Milton Conteh, Abraham Isiaka Jimmy, Rebecca Esliker, Abdul Karim Bangura et al.
World Journal of Public Health
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Contrasting User Benefit Baskets and Provider Payment Options Seeking National Social Health Insurance Choices in Selected Districts for Sierra Leone

Hassan Milton Conteh, Abraham Isiaka Jimmy, Rebecca Esliker, Abdul Karim Bangura, Peter Agyei‐Baffour, Magdalene Umoh, Tenneh Conteh, Lee Jr.
article en

Abstract

In this article, we examine the healthcare potential of the relationship between User/ Benefit Baskets (BB) and Provider/ Payment Options (PO) evolving in six (6) Regional Districts in Sierra Leone, an emerging country in West Africa, and detail how components of Benefit Baskets and Payment Options can impact the nature and scope of implementing a National Social Health Insurance Program in Sierra Leone. Identified and perceived relationships, as revealed by a cross-sectional study, are presented with contextual data from users and providers in the respective six districts. Quantitative data was collected (from August to December 2019) for this research study using a semi-structured questionnaire with a sample size of 1,503 respondents made up of 1,185 household heads and 318 healthcare providers. Data collection, which began during 2019, was analyzed into essential descriptive and inferential statistics. Statistical analysis was run at a significant 5% level using Stata vs 14.0 software. Our results reveal that factors such as marital status, religion, occupation, monthly income, and the district of residents in Sierra Leone were more likely to influence the magnitude of contributions for the content of a User/ Benefit Basket. In contrast, the selection of a Provider/ Payment Option by healthcare providers – such as Diagnostic-Related Grouping (DRG) and Fees-for-Service (FFS), were more likely to be influenced by the level of care provided by the healthcare providers and by the Regional District in which the service providers were situated and operated. Based on our findings, key contextual factors are most likely to influence the content of BBs and POs in Sierra Leone. Hence, we submit that it is appropriate for such contextual factors associated with BBs and POs to be adequately and rigorously considered upon the implementation of a National Social Health Insurance Program for the people of Sierra Leone.

World Journal of Public HealthVol. 10(2)
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), University of Makeni (SL), Ministry of Health and Sanitation (SL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.