A Study on University Merger Cases

This study aims to analyze the process of university mergers and the factors contributing to institutional stabilization following merger, amid the ongoing crisis in higher education driven by declining student populations, intensified competition, and financial pressures. Grounded in new institutionalism theory, the research conceptualizes university mergers not merely as structural adjustments but as institutionalized processes requiring social legitimacy and procedural appropriateness. Three universities that completed mergers and obtained institutional accreditation were selected as case studies. In-depth interviews with key administrators and middle managers involved in the mergers were conducted to collect qualitative data. The findings reveal that while the decision-making process was largely top-down, stakeholder participation and consensus-building during implementation were critical in securing legitimacy. Post-university merger stability was influenced by improvements in financial structure, organizational reconfiguration, and the rebuilding of internal trust—all of which were found to be essential for the long-term sustainability of merged institutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korea Society Of The Politics Of Education
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52183/kspe.2025.32.2.59
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on University Merger Cases

Jongwon Lee
1 links
Korea Society Of The Politics Of Education
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

A Study on University Merger Cases

Jongwon Lee
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the process of university mergers and the factors contributing to institutional stabilization following merger, amid the ongoing crisis in higher education driven by declining student populations, intensified competition, and financial pressures. Grounded in new institutionalism theory, the research conceptualizes university mergers not merely as structural adjustments but as institutionalized processes requiring social legitimacy and procedural appropriateness. Three universities that completed mergers and obtained institutional accreditation were selected as case studies. In-depth interviews with key administrators and middle managers involved in the mergers were conducted to collect qualitative data. The findings reveal that while the decision-making process was largely top-down, stakeholder participation and consensus-building during implementation were critical in securing legitimacy. Post-university merger stability was influenced by improvements in financial structure, organizational reconfiguration, and the rebuilding of internal trust—all of which were found to be essential for the long-term sustainability of merged institutions.

Korea Society Of The Politics Of EducationVol. 32(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.