Unveiling the bracket creep: static versus dynamic fiscal drag

Abstract This paper develops a simple model that accurately quantifies the surtax of not indexing the personal income tax schedule(s) in inflationary scenarios and the corrective compensation in case of total or partial indexing. The model is developed for the individual taxpayer and the population aggregate and identifies two different components within the bracket creep, one static, linked to the pre-inflation taxable income, and the other dynamic, associated with changes in the taxable income. Finally, an empirical application of the model to the case of Spain for 2022 is provided. The findings from this empirical analysis demonstrate that the decision not to index the tax schedule will impose an additional tax of over 1,187 million euros on Spanish taxpayers, of which 94% (1,114 million) corresponds to static bracket creep and the remainder (74 million) to the dynamic component. Paradoxically, although the static component is significantly larger, bracket creep continues to be defined in the literature in terms of its dynamic component.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-025-00914-0
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the bracket creep: static versus dynamic fiscal drag

José Felix Sanz‐Sanz, María Arrazola Vacas
1 links
Journal of Economics
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Unveiling the bracket creep: static versus dynamic fiscal drag

José Felix Sanz‐Sanz, María Arrazola Vacas
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper develops a simple model that accurately quantifies the surtax of not indexing the personal income tax schedule(s) in inflationary scenarios and the corrective compensation in case of total or partial indexing. The model is developed for the individual taxpayer and the population aggregate and identifies two different components within the bracket creep, one static, linked to the pre-inflation taxable income, and the other dynamic, associated with changes in the taxable income. Finally, an empirical application of the model to the case of Spain for 2022 is provided. The findings from this empirical analysis demonstrate that the decision not to index the tax schedule will impose an additional tax of over 1,187 million euros on Spanish taxpayers, of which 94% (1,114 million) corresponds to static bracket creep and the remainder (74 million) to the dynamic component. Paradoxically, although the static component is significantly larger, bracket creep continues to be defined in the literature in terms of its dynamic component.

Journal of EconomicsVol. 146(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unveiling the bracket creep: static versus dynamic fiscal drag — José Felix Sanz‐Sanz, María Arrazola Vacas · Journal of Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS