Is there a negative decadal trend in abundance of the weedy seadragon ( <i>Phyllopteryx taeniolatus</i> )? Comment on survey data summarised in Edgar <i>et al</i> . (2023)

ABSTRACT Decadal changes in abundance of marine organisms along the Australian coastline were reported in a recent Nature paper by Edgar et al. (2023). We reexamine the data used in that paper, and show that the conclusion of a 59% decline in weedy seadragons (Phyllopteryx taeniolatus) cannot be justified based on these data. The data are too sparse, especially for the final survey years of 2020 and 2021, and it is this sparsity in combination with particular modelling choices made by Edgar et al. (2023) that drives their results. While not specifically considered here, it is likely that these issues also affect the results on other rare or cryptic species reported in Edgar et al. (2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Zoologist
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2025.024
Primary Topic
Aquatic life and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there a negative decadal trend in abundance of the weedy seadragon ( Phyllopteryx taeniolatus )? Comment on survey data summarised in Edgar et al . (2023)

David J. Booth, Erik Schlögl
Australian Zoologist
Aquatic life and conservation
article

Is there a negative decadal trend in abundance of the weedy seadragon ( Phyllopteryx taeniolatus )? Comment on survey data summarised in Edgar et al . (2023)

David J. Booth, Erik Schlögl
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Decadal changes in abundance of marine organisms along the Australian coastline were reported in a recent Nature paper by Edgar et al. (2023). We reexamine the data used in that paper, and show that the conclusion of a 59% decline in weedy seadragons (Phyllopteryx taeniolatus) cannot be justified based on these data. The data are too sparse, especially for the final survey years of 2020 and 2021, and it is this sparsity in combination with particular modelling choices made by Edgar et al. (2023) that drives their results. While not specifically considered here, it is likely that these issues also affect the results on other rare or cryptic species reported in Edgar et al. (2023).

Australian ZoologistVol. 44(3)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), African Institute for Mathematical Sciences (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), International Union for Conservation of Nature (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Aquatic life and conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is there a negative decadal trend in abundance of the weedy seadragon ( <i>Phyllopteryx taeniolatus</i> )? Comment on survey data summarised in Edgar <i>et al</i> . (2023) — David J. Booth, Erik Schlögl · Australian Zoologist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS