Nutritional Composition and In Vitro Digestibility of Spent Mushroom Substrate Supplemented with Urea and Molasses for Ruminants

This study aims to evaluate the fermentation characteristics and nutritional potential of spent mushroom substrates (SMS), with or without urea and molasses supplementation, in ruminant diets. SMS derived from the cultivation of four mushroom species— Pleurotus ostreatus (Oyster Mushroom, OYS), Flammulina filiformis (Enoki mushroom, ENK), Hypsizygus marmoreus (Bunashimeji mushroom, SMJ), and Lentinula edodes (Shiitake, STK)—were analyzed for proximate composition, in vitro gas and methane (CH₄) production, dry matter digestibility (DMD), and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA). Statistically significant differences were observed among SMS types across all incubation periods (24, 48, and 72 hours) for gas production, CH₄ production, DMD, and SCFA concentrations (p<0.0001). In addition, CH₄ per gram of digested dry matter (CH₄/DDM) was higher in urea–molasses supplemented SMS compared to non-supplemented substrates (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in total gas production, CH₄ volume, or SCFA concentrations between the two groups, suggesting that fermentation responses were influenced not only by supplementation but also by the inherent differences in substrate composition. The results indicate that different types of SMS vary significantly in their fermentation profiles and digestibility. Supplementation with urea and molasses increased CH₄/DDM but did not significantly affect total gas, CH₄ volume, or SCFA production. These findings demonstrate the potential of SMS as a partial roughage replacement in ruminant diets, as influenced by the type of mushroom substrate, its chemical composition, and the supplementation method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tropical Animal Science Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2025.48.4.364
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutritional Composition and In Vitro Digestibility of Spent Mushroom Substrate Supplemented with Urea and Molasses for Ruminants

Tomomi Ban‐Tokuda, Hiroki Matsui, Jamal James D. Manlapig, Jane Camille A. Crisostomo
2 citations
Tropical Animal Science Journal
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
3.81
article

Nutritional Composition and In Vitro Digestibility of Spent Mushroom Substrate Supplemented with Urea and Molasses for Ruminants

Tomomi Ban‐Tokuda, Hiroki Matsui, Jamal James D. Manlapig, Jane Camille A. Crisostomo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the fermentation characteristics and nutritional potential of spent mushroom substrates (SMS), with or without urea and molasses supplementation, in ruminant diets. SMS derived from the cultivation of four mushroom species— Pleurotus ostreatus (Oyster Mushroom, OYS), Flammulina filiformis (Enoki mushroom, ENK), Hypsizygus marmoreus (Bunashimeji mushroom, SMJ), and Lentinula edodes (Shiitake, STK)—were analyzed for proximate composition, in vitro gas and methane (CH₄) production, dry matter digestibility (DMD), and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA). Statistically significant differences were observed among SMS types across all incubation periods (24, 48, and 72 hours) for gas production, CH₄ production, DMD, and SCFA concentrations (p<0.0001). In addition, CH₄ per gram of digested dry matter (CH₄/DDM) was higher in urea–molasses supplemented SMS compared to non-supplemented substrates (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in total gas production, CH₄ volume, or SCFA concentrations between the two groups, suggesting that fermentation responses were influenced not only by supplementation but also by the inherent differences in substrate composition. The results indicate that different types of SMS vary significantly in their fermentation profiles and digestibility. Supplementation with urea and molasses increased CH₄/DDM but did not significantly affect total gas, CH₄ volume, or SCFA production. These findings demonstrate the potential of SMS as a partial roughage replacement in ruminant diets, as influenced by the type of mushroom substrate, its chemical composition, and the supplementation method.

Tropical Animal Science JournalVol. 48(4)
Mie University (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nutritional Composition and In Vitro Digestibility of Spent Mushroom Substrate Supplemented with Urea and Molasses for Ruminants — Tomomi Ban‐Tokuda, Hiroki Matsui, et al. · Tropical Animal Science Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS