Practicing With Intent: How to Teach an Old Dogma New Tricks

Clinicians are constantly bombarded with an onslaught of newly published data, yet they must make clinical decisions despite a dearth of clinical data. Sometimes, they may fall back on clinical practices entrenched by experience, unaware that they are upheld by dogmatic tradition rather than robust evidence. Ideally, the totality of evidence must be assessed and utilized for clinical decision-making, irrespective of entrenched orthodoxy. Here, we explore the questions, how much evidence is needed to revise established clinical practices and, more fundamentally, can data alone truly catalyze such shifts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf270
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practicing With Intent: How to Teach an Old Dogma New Tricks

Bassam Ghanem, Travis B. Nielsen, Rodrigo Pinheiro Leal Costa, Rachel Baden et al.
1 citations
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
1.52
article

Practicing With Intent: How to Teach an Old Dogma New Tricks

Bassam Ghanem, Travis B. Nielsen, Rodrigo Pinheiro Leal Costa, Rachel Baden, Brad J. Spellberg, Daniel M. Musher, Fergus Hamilton, Emily G. McDonald, Kusha Davar, Matthew C. Phillips, Todd C. Lee, Sarah Freling, Noah Wald‐Dickler, Alfredo J Mena Lora, Steven Y. C. Tong, Rachael A Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Clinicians are constantly bombarded with an onslaught of newly published data, yet they must make clinical decisions despite a dearth of clinical data. Sometimes, they may fall back on clinical practices entrenched by experience, unaware that they are upheld by dogmatic tradition rather than robust evidence. Ideally, the totality of evidence must be assessed and utilized for clinical decision-making, irrespective of entrenched orthodoxy. Here, we explore the questions, how much evidence is needed to revise established clinical practices and, more fundamentally, can data alone truly catalyze such shifts.

Clinical Infectious DiseasesVol. 81(3)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Harvard University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Baylor College of Medicine (US), King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Bristol (GB), University of California San Diego (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), Hospital del Salvador (CL), Peter Doherty Institute (AU), Hospital São Rafael (BR), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB), McGill University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.