Studi Komparatif Algoritma Machine Learning dengan Teknik Bagging dan AdaBoost pada Klasifikasi Kanker Payudara

This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of five Machine Learning classification algorithms—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network (NN), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—in detecting breast cancer using the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) dataset. The evaluation was conducted in stages, beginning with baseline model training, followed by optimization using Bagging ensemble techniques, and further enhanced with the Adaboost algorithm. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, confusion matrix, ROC curve, and Area Under Curve (AUC) metrics. The results show that Logistic Regression demonstrated the most consistent performance, achieving 97.1% accuracy and the highest AUC of 99.7% after Adaboost was applied. Decision Tree also showed noticeable improvement in both accuracy and AUC. In contrast, Neural Network and KNN models were found incompatible with Adaboost. These findings highlight that the effectiveness of ensemble techniques is highly dependent on the nature of the base algorithm. This research contributes to a better understanding of how to select and combine classification algorithms with appropriate optimization strategies to improve the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TEMATIK
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38204/tematik.v12i1.2435
Primary Topic
Computer Science and Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studi Komparatif Algoritma Machine Learning dengan Teknik Bagging dan AdaBoost pada Klasifikasi Kanker Payudara

Rully Pramudita, Nadya Safitri, Vina Zahrotun Nazah
TEMATIK
Computer Science and Engineering
article

Studi Komparatif Algoritma Machine Learning dengan Teknik Bagging dan AdaBoost pada Klasifikasi Kanker Payudara

Rully Pramudita, Nadya Safitri, Vina Zahrotun Nazah
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of five Machine Learning classification algorithms—Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network (NN), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—in detecting breast cancer using the Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) dataset. The evaluation was conducted in stages, beginning with baseline model training, followed by optimization using Bagging ensemble techniques, and further enhanced with the Adaboost algorithm. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, confusion matrix, ROC curve, and Area Under Curve (AUC) metrics. The results show that Logistic Regression demonstrated the most consistent performance, achieving 97.1% accuracy and the highest AUC of 99.7% after Adaboost was applied. Decision Tree also showed noticeable improvement in both accuracy and AUC. In contrast, Neural Network and KNN models were found incompatible with Adaboost. These findings highlight that the effectiveness of ensemble techniques is highly dependent on the nature of the base algorithm. This research contributes to a better understanding of how to select and combine classification algorithms with appropriate optimization strategies to improve the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis.

TEMATIKVol. 12(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Computer Science and Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Studi Komparatif Algoritma Machine Learning dengan Teknik Bagging dan AdaBoost pada Klasifikasi Kanker Payudara — Rully Pramudita, Nadya Safitri, et al. · TEMATIK (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS