Job Satisfaction, Motivation, Leadership Styles, and Teachers’ Performance: A Structural Model

Teachers’ performance plays a vital role in determining the quality of education. This research investigated the connections between job satisfaction, motivation, leadership styles, and teachers' performance in five districts of Misamis Oriental Division during the School Year 2024-2025. It aimed to find out how different leadership styles affect job satisfaction and motivation, and how these elements subsequently influence teaching performance. A predictive-correlational research design was employed, engaging 245 teachers chosen via proportionate stratified random sampling. The tools for data collection comprised the Teacher Job Satisfaction Questionnaire, Work Tasks Motivation Scale for Teachers, DISC Profile, 360-degree leadership feedback, and the Results-Based Performance Management System. Multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling were utilized to examine the relationships among these variables. The participants overall mean score for job satisfaction was M=4.76 (SD=.52), which was described as "strongly agree," indicating that the respondents had a very high level of job satisfaction. Respondents overall mean for motivation is M = 4.79 (SD = .43), described as strongly agree, and can be interpreted as indicating that the respondents have a very high level of motivation. Meanwhile, the overall mean for SD = .43 implies that the data are moderately dispersed around the mean. Respondents recorded overall mean score of M = 4.40 (SD = .804) falls within the "Strongly Agree" category, suggesting that respondents generally perceive their school heads as exhibiting very high levels of leadership across all styles. However, the standard deviation indicates a wide range of responses, pointing to varied experiences among participants. The overall mean across all domains was M = 4.77 (SD = .429), categorized as “Strongly Agree,” indicating a very high level of performance among respondents. The standard deviation of .429 denotes moderate variability, suggesting that while most teachers feel confident in their teaching performance, there are observable differences in practices or experiences across individual educators. The results indicated a high level of job satisfaction among teachers, especially regarding positive relationships with peers, acknowledgment for their contributions, and active participation in professional activities. Both intrinsic and altruistic motivation were identified as the most significant motivators. Teachers perceived their school leaders as predominantly transformational and democratic. Teachers excelled across RPMS domains, with motivation being the strongest indicator of performance, followed by job satisfaction. The SEM analysis verified that motivation served as the essential link connecting leadership, job satisfaction, and performance. The study affirms that teacher performance is shaped primarily by motivation, strengthened through transformational leadership and job satisfaction. The study provides valuable insights for policymakers, school administrators, and teachers to enhance teachers’ performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.410405
Primary Topic
School Leadership and Teacher Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Job Satisfaction, Motivation, Leadership Styles, and Teachers’ Performance: A Structural Model

Andrian Tecson, Elvy Malabo
Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal
School Leadership and Teacher Performance
article

Job Satisfaction, Motivation, Leadership Styles, and Teachers’ Performance: A Structural Model

Andrian Tecson, Elvy Malabo
article en

Abstract

Teachers’ performance plays a vital role in determining the quality of education. This research investigated the connections between job satisfaction, motivation, leadership styles, and teachers' performance in five districts of Misamis Oriental Division during the School Year 2024-2025. It aimed to find out how different leadership styles affect job satisfaction and motivation, and how these elements subsequently influence teaching performance. A predictive-correlational research design was employed, engaging 245 teachers chosen via proportionate stratified random sampling. The tools for data collection comprised the Teacher Job Satisfaction Questionnaire, Work Tasks Motivation Scale for Teachers, DISC Profile, 360-degree leadership feedback, and the Results-Based Performance Management System. Multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling were utilized to examine the relationships among these variables. The participants overall mean score for job satisfaction was M=4.76 (SD=.52), which was described as "strongly agree," indicating that the respondents had a very high level of job satisfaction. Respondents overall mean for motivation is M = 4.79 (SD = .43), described as strongly agree, and can be interpreted as indicating that the respondents have a very high level of motivation. Meanwhile, the overall mean for SD = .43 implies that the data are moderately dispersed around the mean. Respondents recorded overall mean score of M = 4.40 (SD = .804) falls within the "Strongly Agree" category, suggesting that respondents generally perceive their school heads as exhibiting very high levels of leadership across all styles. However, the standard deviation indicates a wide range of responses, pointing to varied experiences among participants. The overall mean across all domains was M = 4.77 (SD = .429), categorized as “Strongly Agree,” indicating a very high level of performance among respondents. The standard deviation of .429 denotes moderate variability, suggesting that while most teachers feel confident in their teaching performance, there are observable differences in practices or experiences across individual educators. The results indicated a high level of job satisfaction among teachers, especially regarding positive relationships with peers, acknowledgment for their contributions, and active participation in professional activities. Both intrinsic and altruistic motivation were identified as the most significant motivators. Teachers perceived their school leaders as predominantly transformational and democratic. Teachers excelled across RPMS domains, with motivation being the strongest indicator of performance, followed by job satisfaction. The SEM analysis verified that motivation served as the essential link connecting leadership, job satisfaction, and performance. The study affirms that teacher performance is shaped primarily by motivation, strengthened through transformational leadership and job satisfaction. The study provides valuable insights for policymakers, school administrators, and teachers to enhance teachers’ performance.

Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary JournalVol. 41(4)
Liceo de Cagayan University (PH), Misamis University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
School Leadership and Teacher Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.