Porous Boundaries Between the Witch Medea and the Fairy Mistress Melusine in Middle English Romance

In this article, I examine John Gower’s use of conventions of popular Middle English romance to retell the Medea and Jason narrative in the Confessio Amantis (c. 1386-90). Gower’s version of Medea is often regarded as unusually sympathetic, as he portrays her as a loving wife and, rather than censoring her magical abilities, he explores her power and craft in more detail than do other late Middle English authors. I argue that Gower’s sympathetic portrayal of Medea in the Confessio is facilitated because he reframes the classical Medea to position her as a very specific type of romance heroine: the fairy mistress or enchantress. Moreover, by comparing Gower’s Medea with the Middle English Melusine—another female figure with a reputation for monstrosity who nevertheless serves as the quintessential type of fairy mistress in romance—I argue that the taxonomical boundaries between the “witch” Medea and “fairy” Melusine are revealed as porous. The shared imagery of water, dragons, serpents and flight exposes the shared taxonomical space between the two characters and thus serves to reinforce the ways in which Gower’s Medea fits the mould of the romance fairy mistress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/148cx
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Porous Boundaries Between the Witch Medea and the Fairy Mistress Melusine in Middle English Romance

Caitlin Coxon
Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines
Medieval Literature and History
article

Porous Boundaries Between the Witch Medea and the Fairy Mistress Melusine in Middle English Romance

Caitlin Coxon
article en

Abstract

In this article, I examine John Gower’s use of conventions of popular Middle English romance to retell the Medea and Jason narrative in the Confessio Amantis (c. 1386-90). Gower’s version of Medea is often regarded as unusually sympathetic, as he portrays her as a loving wife and, rather than censoring her magical abilities, he explores her power and craft in more detail than do other late Middle English authors. I argue that Gower’s sympathetic portrayal of Medea in the Confessio is facilitated because he reframes the classical Medea to position her as a very specific type of romance heroine: the fairy mistress or enchantress. Moreover, by comparing Gower’s Medea with the Middle English Melusine—another female figure with a reputation for monstrosity who nevertheless serves as the quintessential type of fairy mistress in romance—I argue that the taxonomical boundaries between the “witch” Medea and “fairy” Melusine are revealed as porous. The shared imagery of water, dragons, serpents and flight exposes the shared taxonomical space between the two characters and thus serves to reinforce the ways in which Gower’s Medea fits the mould of the romance fairy mistress.

Recherches anglaises et nord-américainesVol. 59
Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.