On the Applicability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework for Analyzing EU Policy Processes

ABSTRACT Initially developed for the US context, the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is increasingly used to analyze policy processes in the EU. But policymaking in EU differs from the US context, why the applicability of ACF in the EU context should be scrutinized. This paper discusses limitations of ACF for analyzing supranational EU policy processes. Policymaking in EU is mainly about collaboration and competition of organizations. Thus, the central concept of ACF—individual beliefs —is difficult to apply. Organizations have cultures, not beliefs. The formal path to policy change in EU is negotiations to reach consensus. These take place in different modes, affecting policy learning. If systems boundaries are adapted to EU governance, organizations are given more attention, and ACF theories are developed to better explain negotiations and policy learning, ACF can complement macro‐level studies of European integration with meso‐level perspectives to better explain policy change in EU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Policy Analysis
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Applicability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework for Analyzing EU Policy Processes

Fredrik von Malmborg
1 citations
European Policy Analysis
Policy Transfer and Learning
8.52
article

On the Applicability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework for Analyzing EU Policy Processes

Fredrik von Malmborg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Initially developed for the US context, the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is increasingly used to analyze policy processes in the EU. But policymaking in EU differs from the US context, why the applicability of ACF in the EU context should be scrutinized. This paper discusses limitations of ACF for analyzing supranational EU policy processes. Policymaking in EU is mainly about collaboration and competition of organizations. Thus, the central concept of ACF—individual beliefs —is difficult to apply. Organizations have cultures, not beliefs. The formal path to policy change in EU is negotiations to reach consensus. These take place in different modes, affecting policy learning. If systems boundaries are adapted to EU governance, organizations are given more attention, and ACF theories are developed to better explain negotiations and policy learning, ACF can complement macro‐level studies of European integration with meso‐level perspectives to better explain policy change in EU.

European Policy AnalysisVol. 12(1)
Linköping University (SE)
Energimyndigheten
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Policy Transfer and Learning
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.