The Importance of Codetermination for Gender Diversity in the Boardroom

ABSTRACT This study examines the interplay of codetermination law and board gender quotas using novel board‐director panel data for Norway. We present descriptive evidence suggesting that boards with employee representatives on boards of directors were more gender diverse before the gender quota. Difference‐in‐differences estimation results reveal that the differential effect of employee representation on gender diversity is negative after implementing the quota. Boards with employee representatives have recruited fewer women during the phase‐in period, and the flexible quota tended to be ineffective. We interpret the effect through employee representation as a potential mediating factor of board gender quotas on gender diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12396
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Codetermination for Gender Diversity in the Boardroom

Katrin Scharfenkamp, Astrid Kunze
1 citations
Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
article

The Importance of Codetermination for Gender Diversity in the Boardroom

Katrin Scharfenkamp, Astrid Kunze
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the interplay of codetermination law and board gender quotas using novel board‐director panel data for Norway. We present descriptive evidence suggesting that boards with employee representatives on boards of directors were more gender diverse before the gender quota. Difference‐in‐differences estimation results reveal that the differential effect of employee representation on gender diversity is negative after implementing the quota. Boards with employee representatives have recruited fewer women during the phase‐in period, and the flexible quota tended to be ineffective. We interpret the effect through employee representation as a potential mediating factor of board gender quotas on gender diversity.

Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and SocietyVol. 65(2)
Bielefeld University (DE), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.