Post Operative Analgesic Efficacy Of Erector Spinae Plane Block VS Serratus Anterior Plane Block In Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy

Introduction: Postoperative pain relief following modified radical mastectomy is usually achieved with a combination of systemic opioids and non-opioid simple analgesics. Variable efficacy of pain relief and opioid associated side effects are major limitations with significant impact on the quality of postoperative recovery.Objectives: To compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) in patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) in terms of the efficacy and duration of analgesia and intraoperative analgesic requirements. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was also studied.Study Design: A prospective comparative study was conducted over 12 months. Sixty female patients aged >18 years with ASA physical status I-III undergoing MRM were enrolled, with 31 in the ESPB group and 29 in the SAPB group. We evaluated the time to first rescue analgesia, intraoperative fentanyl requirements, postoperative pain scores, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.Results: Demographic characteristics were statistically comparable between the groups. The median time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the ESP group (15 hours) compared to the SAB group (6 hours) (p = 0.01). Intraoperative fentanyl requirements were comparable between groups (ESP: 20±15 µg vs. SAB: 25±10 µg). Both groups showed similar incidence of PONV and antiemetic requirements.Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided ESPB demonstrates superior analgesic efficacy compared to SAPB for MRM surgery, providing longer duration of analgesia and reduced intraoperative analgesic requirements. However, it was found that SAPB remains a valuable alternative, particularly when technical simplicity is prioritized or ESPB is contraindicated. Multi-centric studies are warranted with a larger sample size to generalize the findings due to the smaller sample size of the current study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4038/slja.v33i02.9569
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post Operative Analgesic Efficacy Of Erector Spinae Plane Block VS Serratus Anterior Plane Block In Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy

Alicia D’Souza, Kishan Shetty, Divya Vincent, Hezil Saldanha et al.
1 citations
Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
1.05
article

Post Operative Analgesic Efficacy Of Erector Spinae Plane Block VS Serratus Anterior Plane Block In Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy

Alicia D’Souza, Kishan Shetty, Divya Vincent, Hezil Saldanha, Antony Eapen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative pain relief following modified radical mastectomy is usually achieved with a combination of systemic opioids and non-opioid simple analgesics. Variable efficacy of pain relief and opioid associated side effects are major limitations with significant impact on the quality of postoperative recovery.Objectives: To compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) in patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) in terms of the efficacy and duration of analgesia and intraoperative analgesic requirements. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was also studied.Study Design: A prospective comparative study was conducted over 12 months. Sixty female patients aged >18 years with ASA physical status I-III undergoing MRM were enrolled, with 31 in the ESPB group and 29 in the SAPB group. We evaluated the time to first rescue analgesia, intraoperative fentanyl requirements, postoperative pain scores, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.Results: Demographic characteristics were statistically comparable between the groups. The median time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in the ESP group (15 hours) compared to the SAB group (6 hours) (p = 0.01). Intraoperative fentanyl requirements were comparable between groups (ESP: 20±15 µg vs. SAB: 25±10 µg). Both groups showed similar incidence of PONV and antiemetic requirements.Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided ESPB demonstrates superior analgesic efficacy compared to SAPB for MRM surgery, providing longer duration of analgesia and reduced intraoperative analgesic requirements. However, it was found that SAPB remains a valuable alternative, particularly when technical simplicity is prioritized or ESPB is contraindicated. Multi-centric studies are warranted with a larger sample size to generalize the findings due to the smaller sample size of the current study.

Sri Lankan Journal of AnaesthesiologyVol. 33(02)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.