Analytics of Self‐Regulated Learning in Learning Analytics Feedback Processes: Associations With Feedback Literacy in Secondary Education

ABSTRACT Background A key skill for self‐regulated learners is the ability to critically interpret and act on feedback—key components of feedback literacy. Yet, the connection between feedback literacy and self‐regulated learning (SRL) remains underexplored, particularly in terms of how different levels of feedback literacy influence SRL processes in authentic learning contexts. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the interplay between feedback literacy and SRL processes among secondary school students while working on a multi‐source writing task using an online learning analytics (LA) platform. Methods The study involved 99 secondary school students from multiple nations (Brazil, UAE, India, and Australia) engaged in multi‐source writing tasks. Students received personalised scaffolding feedback designed to enhance their SRL processes. Using K‐medoids clustering, students were grouped based on their self‐reported feedback literacy levels. Ordered Network Analysis (ONA) was employed to visualise and analyse trace data from the learning analytics platform, revealing SRL strategies across different feedback literacy profiles. Results and Conclusions Analysis of data from the 99 participants revealed two distinct feedback literacy groups with different SRL patterns. Proactive Feedback Engagers ( n = 55) initially showed less effective SRL strategies but demonstrated significant improvement after receiving scaffolding interventions, adopting more balanced and adaptive regulation processes. In contrast, Moderate Feedback Engagers ( n = 48) began with a more strategic approach but showed less adaptability as the task progressed, diverging from suggested SRL processes. These findings imply the need for more adaptive scaffolding approaches based on students' feedback literacy levels, highlighting the importance of tailored support in developing learning strategies based on different levels of feedback literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70076
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytics of Self‐Regulated Learning in Learning Analytics Feedback Processes: Associations With Feedback Literacy in Secondary Education

Rafael Ferreira Mello, Dragan Gašević, Roberto Martínez‐Maldonado, Tongguang Li et al.
5 citations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Online Learning and Analytics
8.47
article

Analytics of Self‐Regulated Learning in Learning Analytics Feedback Processes: Associations With Feedback Literacy in Secondary Education

Rafael Ferreira Mello, Dragan Gašević, Roberto Martínez‐Maldonado, Tongguang Li, Heba AbuZayyad-Nuseibeh, Cleon Xavier, Luiz Rodrigues, Mladen Raković, Flora Jin, Xinyu Li, Yi‐Shan Tsai, Debarshi Nath, Rui Guan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background A key skill for self‐regulated learners is the ability to critically interpret and act on feedback—key components of feedback literacy. Yet, the connection between feedback literacy and self‐regulated learning (SRL) remains underexplored, particularly in terms of how different levels of feedback literacy influence SRL processes in authentic learning contexts. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the interplay between feedback literacy and SRL processes among secondary school students while working on a multi‐source writing task using an online learning analytics (LA) platform. Methods The study involved 99 secondary school students from multiple nations (Brazil, UAE, India, and Australia) engaged in multi‐source writing tasks. Students received personalised scaffolding feedback designed to enhance their SRL processes. Using K‐medoids clustering, students were grouped based on their self‐reported feedback literacy levels. Ordered Network Analysis (ONA) was employed to visualise and analyse trace data from the learning analytics platform, revealing SRL strategies across different feedback literacy profiles. Results and Conclusions Analysis of data from the 99 participants revealed two distinct feedback literacy groups with different SRL patterns. Proactive Feedback Engagers ( n = 55) initially showed less effective SRL strategies but demonstrated significant improvement after receiving scaffolding interventions, adopting more balanced and adaptive regulation processes. In contrast, Moderate Feedback Engagers ( n = 48) began with a more strategic approach but showed less adaptability as the task progressed, diverging from suggested SRL processes. These findings imply the need for more adaptive scaffolding approaches based on students' feedback literacy levels, highlighting the importance of tailored support in developing learning strategies based on different levels of feedback literacy.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 41(4)
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN), IITB-Monash Research Academy (IN), University of Sharjah (AE), Instituto Federal Goiano (BR), Monash University (AU), Universidade Federal de Alagoas (BR)
Monash University, Jacobs Foundation, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Online Learning and Analytics
8.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.