Rejoinder to Comments on “The Future of Rice in Asia: Public and Private Roles”

Dawe and Timmer responded to the insightful critiques by Briones and Wong, who each highlight important but distinct perspectives: Briones urges deeper analysis of structural transformation, price stabilization, and climate challenges, while Wong emphasizes practical insights from private sector innovations and evolving trade realities. Acknowledging the value of both views, the authors focus their reply on specific points raised and express strong support for a proposed regional research initiative on the future of rice in Asia.