W-Band RCS Prediction of Small Objects: Comparing Two Widely Used Methods with Experimental Validation

This paper compares the accuracy of Shooting and Bouncing Rays and Electric Field Integral Equation methods for Radar Cross Section prediction of small objects at 77-81 GHz band. Existing studies on RCS prediction methods often lack comprehensive comparisons between computational and experimental results, particularly for small objects measured with a 77 GHz radar. This study addresses this gap by presenting an in-depth analysis of both simulation and measurement data. In this work, three targets with varying geometries and materials were measured with a frequency modulated continuous wave radar and simulated using Ansys HFSS and CST Studio Suite. The measurements were performed with a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) frequency modulated continuous wave radar operating at 77–81 GHz. This study aims to emphasize the importance of considering both efficiency and accuracy when opting for an RCS prediction method. Overall, the outcomes of both methods have largely demonstrated good alignment. It has been noted that, while Shooting and Bouncing Rays method offers promising time-saving advantages, Electric Field Integral Equation method remains a valuable tool for complex geometries where precise results are crucial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1488832
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

W-Band RCS Prediction of Small Objects: Comparing Two Widely Used Methods with Experimental Validation

Ali Kara, Funda Ergün Yardım, Elif Aydın, Deniz Sezgin
GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
article

W-Band RCS Prediction of Small Objects: Comparing Two Widely Used Methods with Experimental Validation

Ali Kara, Funda Ergün Yardım, Elif Aydın, Deniz Sezgin
article en

Abstract

This paper compares the accuracy of Shooting and Bouncing Rays and Electric Field Integral Equation methods for Radar Cross Section prediction of small objects at 77-81 GHz band. Existing studies on RCS prediction methods often lack comprehensive comparisons between computational and experimental results, particularly for small objects measured with a 77 GHz radar. This study addresses this gap by presenting an in-depth analysis of both simulation and measurement data. In this work, three targets with varying geometries and materials were measured with a frequency modulated continuous wave radar and simulated using Ansys HFSS and CST Studio Suite. The measurements were performed with a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) frequency modulated continuous wave radar operating at 77–81 GHz. This study aims to emphasize the importance of considering both efficiency and accuracy when opting for an RCS prediction method. Overall, the outcomes of both methods have largely demonstrated good alignment. It has been noted that, while Shooting and Bouncing Rays method offers promising time-saving advantages, Electric Field Integral Equation method remains a valuable tool for complex geometries where precise results are crucial.

GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCEVol. 38(3)
Çankaya University (TR), Gazi Hastanesi (TR), Atilim University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

W-Band RCS Prediction of Small Objects: Comparing Two Widely Used Methods with Experimental Validation — Ali Kara, Funda Ergün Yardım, et al. · GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS