PRIVACY PREFERENCES AND TRUST IN CENTRAL BANKS: HETEROGENEITY IN CASE OF CBDC

Broad societal uptake of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is contingent on both its design features and public confidence in the issuing central bank. Based on survey results evaluated using Likert scales, this paper puts forth quantitative metrics assessing general privacy concerns alongside those specific to digital and financial interactions. Although baseline consistency in privacy preferences is observed, it dissipates when choice complexity increases. Significantly, we find no systematic relationship between individuals' quantified privacy preference levels and their choices regarding CBDC anonymity vs. functionality, their trust in the central bank's ability to protect CBDC privacy, or their belief in central bank independence as essential for that protection. Cluster analysis identifies respondent groups displaying preference consistency, the privacy paradox, or intermediate behaviours. These findings highlight substantial preference heterogeneity under complex choices, a critical factor for effective CBDC design. Consequently, central banks should engage more deeply in understanding user preferences and promoting CBDC functionality, ensuring privacy is not overlooked.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.62.2025.4734
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRIVACY PREFERENCES AND TRUST IN CENTRAL BANKS: HETEROGENEITY IN CASE OF CBDC

Yurii Ivashuk, Віктор Козюк, Yuriy Hayda
2 citations
Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
6.49
article

PRIVACY PREFERENCES AND TRUST IN CENTRAL BANKS: HETEROGENEITY IN CASE OF CBDC

Yurii Ivashuk, Віктор Козюк, Yuriy Hayda
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Broad societal uptake of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is contingent on both its design features and public confidence in the issuing central bank. Based on survey results evaluated using Likert scales, this paper puts forth quantitative metrics assessing general privacy concerns alongside those specific to digital and financial interactions. Although baseline consistency in privacy preferences is observed, it dissipates when choice complexity increases. Significantly, we find no systematic relationship between individuals' quantified privacy preference levels and their choices regarding CBDC anonymity vs. functionality, their trust in the central bank's ability to protect CBDC privacy, or their belief in central bank independence as essential for that protection. Cluster analysis identifies respondent groups displaying preference consistency, the privacy paradox, or intermediate behaviours. These findings highlight substantial preference heterogeneity under complex choices, a critical factor for effective CBDC design. Consequently, central banks should engage more deeply in understanding user preferences and promoting CBDC functionality, ensuring privacy is not overlooked.

Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practiceVol. 3(62)
West Ukrainian National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PRIVACY PREFERENCES AND TRUST IN CENTRAL BANKS: HETEROGENEITY IN CASE OF CBDC — Yurii Ivashuk, Віктор Козюк, et al. · Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS