FRAUD HUNTERS AROUND THE WORLD: FIGHTING DECEPTION IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

As financial fraud grows more sophisticated and global in scope, countries have developed diverse mechanisms to detect, investigate, and prosecute fraudulent activities. This article presents a comparative analysis of fraud-hunting institutions in seven countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, China, India, Germany, Nigeria, and Brazil. It explores the structure, powers, and operational strategies of government agencies and private auditors tasked with combating fraud, including the use of artificial intelligence, digital forensics, and inter-agency cooperation. The study draws on landmark investigations – such as the Enron scandal, LIBOR manipulation, the Wirecard collapse, and Brazil’s Operation Car Wash – to highlight differences in institutional responses, transparency, and whistleblower protection. While advanced economies benefit from robust regulatory oversight and legal safeguards, emerging markets face challenges such as limited forensic capacity, political interference, and weaker protections for informants. Despite these differences, there is a global trend toward enhanced technological tools and cross-border enforcement collaboration. The analysis concludes that no single model guarantees success. Instead, effective anti-fraud efforts rely on a combination of legal authority, institutional independence, technological integration, and political will to act decisively against financial misconduct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-economic relations in the digital society
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.2.56.2025.606
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRAUD HUNTERS AROUND THE WORLD: FIGHTING DECEPTION IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

Iryna Mihus
Socio-economic relations in the digital society
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
article

FRAUD HUNTERS AROUND THE WORLD: FIGHTING DECEPTION IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

Iryna Mihus
article en

Abstract

As financial fraud grows more sophisticated and global in scope, countries have developed diverse mechanisms to detect, investigate, and prosecute fraudulent activities. This article presents a comparative analysis of fraud-hunting institutions in seven countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, China, India, Germany, Nigeria, and Brazil. It explores the structure, powers, and operational strategies of government agencies and private auditors tasked with combating fraud, including the use of artificial intelligence, digital forensics, and inter-agency cooperation. The study draws on landmark investigations – such as the Enron scandal, LIBOR manipulation, the Wirecard collapse, and Brazil’s Operation Car Wash – to highlight differences in institutional responses, transparency, and whistleblower protection. While advanced economies benefit from robust regulatory oversight and legal safeguards, emerging markets face challenges such as limited forensic capacity, political interference, and weaker protections for informants. Despite these differences, there is a global trend toward enhanced technological tools and cross-border enforcement collaboration. The analysis concludes that no single model guarantees success. Instead, effective anti-fraud efforts rely on a combination of legal authority, institutional independence, technological integration, and political will to act decisively against financial misconduct.

Socio-economic relations in the digital societyVol. 2(56)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.