Performance of Commonly-Used Modified Exercise Tests in Patients with COVID-19 Infection

Introduction: Although hypoxaemia is an important prognostic factor in COVID-19, its absence is not always reassuring, as some patients with initially mild symptoms can rapidly progress into severe or critical diseases. The aim was to compare the performance of modified exercise tests against a 6-minute walk test and investigate if modified exercise tests can be used as an early severity prediction tool.Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included all patients aged 12 and above admitted to the University Medical Unit of Teaching Hospital Anuradhapura with COVID-19 infection and normal resting oxygen saturation (94–100%). Patients with acute and chronic cardiorespiratory diseases were excluded. Each participant was randomly allocated to perform one of the three selected modified exercise tests, a 1-minute sit-to-stand test, a 30-second sit-to-stand test, and a 40-step walk test. All underwent a 6-minute walk test after 15 minutes of rest, as the latter is validated in some respiratory diseases. Saturation before and after each test and patient outcomes were recorded. Desaturation by 3% or more was considered a positive test.Results: Males were the majority (56.5%, n=62), and the mean age was 45.8(SD+16.3) years. Proportions for positive tests were 5/22(22.7%) for 1-minute sit-to-stand test, 4/23(17.3%) for 30-second sit-to-stand test, 5/17(29.4%) for 40-step walk test and 9/62(14.5%) for 6-minute walk test. None developed severe disease in this sample. Only two patients (3%) developed moderate disease needing oxygen; one had both negative 30-second sit-to-stand test and 6-minute walk test, while the other was positive for the 40-step walk test and the 6-minute walk test. Eleven (17.7%) had a negative 6-minute walk test despite a positive modified exercise test.Conclusions: Modified exercise tests and the 6-minute walk test are not comparable. We recommend adequately powered large-scale studies to test the validity of these tests in clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tropical Health
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4038/joth.v1i2.14
Primary Topic
Muscle and Compartmental Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Commonly-Used Modified Exercise Tests in Patients with COVID-19 Infection

Lanka Wijekoon, J. M. R. P. Bandara, Prasanna Weerawansa, Chamara Sarathchandra et al.
Journal of Tropical Health
Muscle and Compartmental Disorders
article

Performance of Commonly-Used Modified Exercise Tests in Patients with COVID-19 Infection

Lanka Wijekoon, J. M. R. P. Bandara, Prasanna Weerawansa, Chamara Sarathchandra, Sisira Hemananda Siribaddana, Manoj Chathuranga, Hemal Senanayake, Somya Kumari, Shivajini Shanmugalingam, Inu Wijerathne
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Although hypoxaemia is an important prognostic factor in COVID-19, its absence is not always reassuring, as some patients with initially mild symptoms can rapidly progress into severe or critical diseases. The aim was to compare the performance of modified exercise tests against a 6-minute walk test and investigate if modified exercise tests can be used as an early severity prediction tool.Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included all patients aged 12 and above admitted to the University Medical Unit of Teaching Hospital Anuradhapura with COVID-19 infection and normal resting oxygen saturation (94–100%). Patients with acute and chronic cardiorespiratory diseases were excluded. Each participant was randomly allocated to perform one of the three selected modified exercise tests, a 1-minute sit-to-stand test, a 30-second sit-to-stand test, and a 40-step walk test. All underwent a 6-minute walk test after 15 minutes of rest, as the latter is validated in some respiratory diseases. Saturation before and after each test and patient outcomes were recorded. Desaturation by 3% or more was considered a positive test.Results: Males were the majority (56.5%, n=62), and the mean age was 45.8(SD+16.3) years. Proportions for positive tests were 5/22(22.7%) for 1-minute sit-to-stand test, 4/23(17.3%) for 30-second sit-to-stand test, 5/17(29.4%) for 40-step walk test and 9/62(14.5%) for 6-minute walk test. None developed severe disease in this sample. Only two patients (3%) developed moderate disease needing oxygen; one had both negative 30-second sit-to-stand test and 6-minute walk test, while the other was positive for the 40-step walk test and the 6-minute walk test. Eleven (17.7%) had a negative 6-minute walk test despite a positive modified exercise test.Conclusions: Modified exercise tests and the 6-minute walk test are not comparable. We recommend adequately powered large-scale studies to test the validity of these tests in clinical practice.

Journal of Tropical HealthVol. 1(2)
Rajarata University of Sri Lanka
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Muscle and Compartmental Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.