Definisi Konseptual E-Government dan E-Governance : Analisis Komparatif

This research examines the conceptual distinctions between e-government and e-governance through comprehensive literature analysis. Although these terms are often used interchangeably, there are fundamental differences in their conceptual foundations, scope, and practical implications. The findings reveal that e-government tends to focus on technical and administrative aspects of technology implementation in government, while e-governance encompasses a broader perspective on the transformation of relationships between government, citizens, and other stakeholders. This research proposes an integrated conceptual framework that positions both concepts along a continuum of digital government development. The findings provide necessary conceptual clarification for theoretical development and practical implementation in the field of digital public administration, while encouraging a more holistic approach to understanding digital government transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wacana Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Interdisiplin
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37304/wacana.v12i1.21430
Primary Topic
Public Administration in Developing Nations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Definisi Konseptual E-Government dan E-Governance : Analisis Komparatif

Nike Purnamawati, Erinda Alfiani Fauzi
Wacana Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Interdisiplin
Public Administration in Developing Nations
article

Definisi Konseptual E-Government dan E-Governance : Analisis Komparatif

Nike Purnamawati, Erinda Alfiani Fauzi
article en

Abstract

This research examines the conceptual distinctions between e-government and e-governance through comprehensive literature analysis. Although these terms are often used interchangeably, there are fundamental differences in their conceptual foundations, scope, and practical implications. The findings reveal that e-government tends to focus on technical and administrative aspects of technology implementation in government, while e-governance encompasses a broader perspective on the transformation of relationships between government, citizens, and other stakeholders. This research proposes an integrated conceptual framework that positions both concepts along a continuum of digital government development. The findings provide necessary conceptual clarification for theoretical development and practical implementation in the field of digital public administration, while encouraging a more holistic approach to understanding digital government transformation.

Wacana Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik InterdisiplinVol. 12(1)
University of Palangka Raya (ID), Lambung Mangkurat University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Public Administration in Developing Nations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Definisi Konseptual E-Government dan E-Governance : Analisis Komparatif — Nike Purnamawati, Erinda Alfiani Fauzi · Wacana Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Interdisiplin (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS