COVID kit adverse effects and mortality in critically ill patients: cross-sectional study

Objective: To compare the outcomes of the COVID-19 patients who used the COVID Kit in their treatment with those who did not. Methods: This was a single-center, analytical, cross-sectional, and observational study. Results: The study included 49 COVID-19-positive patients; from those, 65.4% were over 50 years old, 50.0% were male, 36.5% were brown, 44.2% obese, and 73.1% had morbidity. Patients who used the COVID Kit had a higher prevalence of altered platelets, creatine phosphokinase, liver function, and cardiac arrhythmias, with significant changes in intestinal function and potassium level. However, mortality proportions were equal between groups. Conclusion: Patients who used the COVID Kit had a higher prevalence of adverse effects, including changes in clinical and laboratory tests. In addition, the COVID-19 Kit did not decrease mortality in these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17665/1676-4285.20246773
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COVID kit adverse effects and mortality in critically ill patients: cross-sectional study

Cawana da Silva do Nascimento, Patrícia Rezende do Prado, Gabriel Bezerra de Souza, Gül Bülbül Maraş et al.
Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

COVID kit adverse effects and mortality in critically ill patients: cross-sectional study

Cawana da Silva do Nascimento, Patrícia Rezende do Prado, Gabriel Bezerra de Souza, Gül Bülbül Maraş, Ítala Maria Araújo Andrade, Elem Kocaçal, Thatiana Lameira Maciel Amaral, Cristina Tavares de Aguiar Avilar
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcomes of the COVID-19 patients who used the COVID Kit in their treatment with those who did not. Methods: This was a single-center, analytical, cross-sectional, and observational study. Results: The study included 49 COVID-19-positive patients; from those, 65.4% were over 50 years old, 50.0% were male, 36.5% were brown, 44.2% obese, and 73.1% had morbidity. Patients who used the COVID Kit had a higher prevalence of altered platelets, creatine phosphokinase, liver function, and cardiac arrhythmias, with significant changes in intestinal function and potassium level. However, mortality proportions were equal between groups. Conclusion: Patients who used the COVID Kit had a higher prevalence of adverse effects, including changes in clinical and laboratory tests. In addition, the COVID-19 Kit did not decrease mortality in these patients.

Online Brazilian Journal of NursingVol. 23(Fluxo Contínuo)
Universidade Federal do Acre (BR), Izmir University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COVID kit adverse effects and mortality in critically ill patients: cross-sectional study — Cawana da Silva do Nascimento, Patrícia Rezende do Prado, et al. · Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS