Studying The Health Implications Of Metro Rail Or Highway Construction On Local Communities

Considering Indian legislation, this study investigates the frequently disregarded public health effects that metro rail and highway construction have on nearby communities. Populations living close to building sites face a variety of health dangers as India's infrastructure development picks up speed, aided by the country's fast urbanisation and economic expansion. These hazards include exposure to excessive noise and tainted water supplies, mental health problems brought on by relocation, and respiratory ailments brought on by air pollution. Despite these effects, the health risks connected to such massive metropolitan projects are not sufficiently addressed by India's current regulatory framework. In addition to a comparative analysis of international legal frameworks from countries including the US, EU, Australia, and Canada, the analysis includes a thorough evaluation of Indian statutes, pertinent case law, and environmental regulations. These nations' infrastructure planning systems incorporate strong monitoring procedures, public participation procedures, and Health Impact Assessments (HIAs).The results show that health issues are frequently marginalised by India's legal system, which prioritises economic or environmental factors above health issues. The integration of health impact assessments into infrastructure governance is severely lacking in practice. Although the judiciary has been instrumental in establishing the right to health under Article 21, its recognition has not resulted in the implementation of systematic legal protections or enforceable health standards in infrastructure-related projects.The study emphasises how inadequate accountability for health outcomes is caused by the absence of required HIAs, low public engagement, and inadequate post-approval monitoring. This paper highlights the urgent need for reform by critically analysing India's legal and policy shortcomings and comparing it to international best practices. It promotes more community involvement, post-project health audits, and the required inclusion of health impact assessments in the EIA process. In order to institutionalise a more comprehensive and preventive approach to development, it also urges interagency coordination between health departments, urban planners, and legal bodies.The paper makes the case for proactive legal frameworks that incorporate health issues throughout all phases of infrastructure construction, as opposed to reactive ones. In order to achieve inclusive, sustainable, and socially equitable urban expansion in India, public health must be treated as a fundamental legal and ethical concern. In order to bring India's infrastructure governance into line with its constitutional commitment to the right to health, the paper makes specific legislative and policy proposals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Sciences
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64252/vgzzs335
Primary Topic
Public Health and Nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studying The Health Implications Of Metro Rail Or Highway Construction On Local Communities

Parvathy Anu Lee
International Journal of Environmental Sciences
Public Health and Nutrition
article

Studying The Health Implications Of Metro Rail Or Highway Construction On Local Communities

Parvathy Anu Lee
article en

Abstract

Considering Indian legislation, this study investigates the frequently disregarded public health effects that metro rail and highway construction have on nearby communities. Populations living close to building sites face a variety of health dangers as India's infrastructure development picks up speed, aided by the country's fast urbanisation and economic expansion. These hazards include exposure to excessive noise and tainted water supplies, mental health problems brought on by relocation, and respiratory ailments brought on by air pollution. Despite these effects, the health risks connected to such massive metropolitan projects are not sufficiently addressed by India's current regulatory framework. In addition to a comparative analysis of international legal frameworks from countries including the US, EU, Australia, and Canada, the analysis includes a thorough evaluation of Indian statutes, pertinent case law, and environmental regulations. These nations' infrastructure planning systems incorporate strong monitoring procedures, public participation procedures, and Health Impact Assessments (HIAs).The results show that health issues are frequently marginalised by India's legal system, which prioritises economic or environmental factors above health issues. The integration of health impact assessments into infrastructure governance is severely lacking in practice. Although the judiciary has been instrumental in establishing the right to health under Article 21, its recognition has not resulted in the implementation of systematic legal protections or enforceable health standards in infrastructure-related projects.The study emphasises how inadequate accountability for health outcomes is caused by the absence of required HIAs, low public engagement, and inadequate post-approval monitoring. This paper highlights the urgent need for reform by critically analysing India's legal and policy shortcomings and comparing it to international best practices. It promotes more community involvement, post-project health audits, and the required inclusion of health impact assessments in the EIA process. In order to institutionalise a more comprehensive and preventive approach to development, it also urges interagency coordination between health departments, urban planners, and legal bodies.The paper makes the case for proactive legal frameworks that incorporate health issues throughout all phases of infrastructure construction, as opposed to reactive ones. In order to achieve inclusive, sustainable, and socially equitable urban expansion in India, public health must be treated as a fundamental legal and ethical concern. In order to bring India's infrastructure governance into line with its constitutional commitment to the right to health, the paper makes specific legislative and policy proposals.

International Journal of Environmental SciencesVol. 11(7s)
Amity University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Public Health and Nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.