Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of bilateral scientific and technical projects

The implementation of each bilateral scientific and technical project undoubtedly makes a significant contribution to strengthening international scientific cooperation. However, attempts to somehow measure and record this contribution face a number of questions about the mechanisms and indicators that should be taken into account to assess the effectiveness of S&T projects. The article discusses the main indicators of the implementation of scientific and technical projects and the criteria that these indicators must meet in order to be able to assess the effectiveness of project implementation. The difference between the concepts of “effectiveness” and “efficiency” is defined. The main methods for assessing the effectiveness of scientific and technical projects, such as the Technology Value Pyramid (TVP), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), and the meta-boundary approach, are considered. The main advantages and disadvantages of each method and the possibility of using it to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral science and technology projects in Ukraine are identified. One of the main tasks of the system for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific and technical projects should be the ability to sufficiently predict the effectiveness of project implementation at the application stage or in the preparatory period. This is especially true for projects that receive public funding. The author emphasizes the insufficient level of research on mechanisms for assessing the effectiveness of scientific and technical projects and their impact on the development of international cooperation in general.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Technologies Innovation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35668/2520-6524-2025-2-05
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of bilateral scientific and technical projects

S. P. Ihnatsevych
1 citations
Science Technologies Innovation
Innovation Policy and R&D
3.13
article

Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of bilateral scientific and technical projects

S. P. Ihnatsevych
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The implementation of each bilateral scientific and technical project undoubtedly makes a significant contribution to strengthening international scientific cooperation. However, attempts to somehow measure and record this contribution face a number of questions about the mechanisms and indicators that should be taken into account to assess the effectiveness of S&T projects. The article discusses the main indicators of the implementation of scientific and technical projects and the criteria that these indicators must meet in order to be able to assess the effectiveness of project implementation. The difference between the concepts of “effectiveness” and “efficiency” is defined. The main methods for assessing the effectiveness of scientific and technical projects, such as the Technology Value Pyramid (TVP), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), and the meta-boundary approach, are considered. The main advantages and disadvantages of each method and the possibility of using it to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral science and technology projects in Ukraine are identified. One of the main tasks of the system for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific and technical projects should be the ability to sufficiently predict the effectiveness of project implementation at the application stage or in the preparatory period. This is especially true for projects that receive public funding. The author emphasizes the insufficient level of research on mechanisms for assessing the effectiveness of scientific and technical projects and their impact on the development of international cooperation in general.

Science Technologies Innovation(№2(34))
Institute of Scientific and Technical Information (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovation Policy and R&D
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of bilateral scientific and technical projects — S. P. Ihnatsevych · Science Technologies Innovation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS