Non‐State Regulators? Civil Society as Extension of the State in a Context of a Regularization Scheme for Undocumented Migrants

ABSTRACT “Opération Papyrus” was implemented in the Swiss Canton of Geneva between 2017 and 2018 with the aim of granting residence permits to undocumented migrants who met pre‐established criteria. This program serves as an exemplary case of involving nongovernmental actors to facilitate what were originally state‐controlled procedures. Civil society organizations (CSOs) exercised discretionary power and played a pivotal role in negotiating the program's design and acting as gatekeepers, ensuring that only eligible individuals applied, thereby reducing the administrative workload. Our paper primarily focuses on the unique role played by civil society organizations, extending the reach of the state, as they acted independently as regulators and maintained proximity to the individuals involved, enhancing the program's effectiveness. The analysis is based on 10 retrospective interviews with cantonal and federal civil servants and representatives from CSOs, supplemented with additional official documents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Policy Analysis
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70012
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐State Regulators? Civil Society as Extension of the State in a Context of a Regularization Scheme for Undocumented Migrants

Yves Jackson, Claudine Burton‐Jeangros, Jan‐Erik Rèfle, Adela Sanela Elezovic
European Policy Analysis
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Non‐State Regulators? Civil Society as Extension of the State in a Context of a Regularization Scheme for Undocumented Migrants

Yves Jackson, Claudine Burton‐Jeangros, Jan‐Erik Rèfle, Adela Sanela Elezovic
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT “Opération Papyrus” was implemented in the Swiss Canton of Geneva between 2017 and 2018 with the aim of granting residence permits to undocumented migrants who met pre‐established criteria. This program serves as an exemplary case of involving nongovernmental actors to facilitate what were originally state‐controlled procedures. Civil society organizations (CSOs) exercised discretionary power and played a pivotal role in negotiating the program's design and acting as gatekeepers, ensuring that only eligible individuals applied, thereby reducing the administrative workload. Our paper primarily focuses on the unique role played by civil society organizations, extending the reach of the state, as they acted independently as regulators and maintained proximity to the individuals involved, enhancing the program's effectiveness. The analysis is based on 10 retrospective interviews with cantonal and federal civil servants and representatives from CSOs, supplemented with additional official documents.

European Policy AnalysisVol. 12(1)
University of Geneva (CH), FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (CH), University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Bundesamt für Gesundheit
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.