Investigating EFL Teachers’ Attitudes toward Alternative Assessment

Over the last decades, the widespread view that English is now a lingua franca has increased the prominence of English language teaching methodology and has led to the continuous revision and amendment of pedagogical issues such as language teaching and learning along with testing and assessment. To that end, there has been a considerable emphasis on the alignment of assessment practices with language teaching and learning practices. Accordingly, language assessment, more specifically, alternative assessment has been one of the critical issues that have received much attention in the field of language teaching. This current study, which was conducted quantitatively and qualitatively has aimed to explore the attitudes of teachers of English as a foreign language towards AA methods. The participants of the study, 137 EFL teachers who work in the state primary, secondary and high schools in the province of Samsun in Türkiye, responded to the 5-Likert scale with 15 items developed by İzci et al (2014) in the survey part of the study. For the qualitative phase of the study, 16 teachers consented to be interviewed to answer four open-ended questions. The findings of the study revealed that , in general, the EFL teachers held a positive view on alternative assessment methods. Other findings also showed that their attitudes varied significantly in favour of the teachers who received inservice training, and that the participants also had the view that teachers often face the challenges which impede the use of alternative assessment tools and/or that there are factors which prevent them from implementing these methods efficiently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language Research
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51726/jlr.1689906
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating EFL Teachers’ Attitudes toward Alternative Assessment

Gülay Er, Fatma Ozcan
Journal of Language Research
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Investigating EFL Teachers’ Attitudes toward Alternative Assessment

Gülay Er, Fatma Ozcan
article en

Abstract

Over the last decades, the widespread view that English is now a lingua franca has increased the prominence of English language teaching methodology and has led to the continuous revision and amendment of pedagogical issues such as language teaching and learning along with testing and assessment. To that end, there has been a considerable emphasis on the alignment of assessment practices with language teaching and learning practices. Accordingly, language assessment, more specifically, alternative assessment has been one of the critical issues that have received much attention in the field of language teaching. This current study, which was conducted quantitatively and qualitatively has aimed to explore the attitudes of teachers of English as a foreign language towards AA methods. The participants of the study, 137 EFL teachers who work in the state primary, secondary and high schools in the province of Samsun in Türkiye, responded to the 5-Likert scale with 15 items developed by İzci et al (2014) in the survey part of the study. For the qualitative phase of the study, 16 teachers consented to be interviewed to answer four open-ended questions. The findings of the study revealed that , in general, the EFL teachers held a positive view on alternative assessment methods. Other findings also showed that their attitudes varied significantly in favour of the teachers who received inservice training, and that the participants also had the view that teachers often face the challenges which impede the use of alternative assessment tools and/or that there are factors which prevent them from implementing these methods efficiently.

Journal of Language ResearchVol. 9(1)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.