Racism “Denial” in Asia: Critical Discourse Analysis of UN CERD State Reports, 1978–2023

This study examines racism “denial” in Asia through a critical discourse analysis of state reports submitted to the United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) by 16 Asian countries from 1978 to 2023. Our findings reveal that denial is not just a rhetorical tool for deflecting accusations but functions as a deeply embedded mechanism to justify and reinforce existing discrimination. Importantly, these state discourses are shaped by social, political, and religious values, as well as struggles for national liberation, unity, and security. By unpacking these layers in historically and comparatively informed ways, we identify and classify patterns of discursive denial—literal, interpretive, and ideological—with subcategories for each. This study not only adds to empirical inquiry into racisms in often neglected Asian contexts but also presents a conceptual framework for examining the diverse manifestations and articulations of race and racism, extending beyond the explanatory capacity of existing dominant theories of race developed through Western lenses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251350290
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racism “Denial” in Asia: Critical Discourse Analysis of UN CERD State Reports, 1978–2023

Junki Nakahara, Gi-Wook Shin
Critical Sociology
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

Racism “Denial” in Asia: Critical Discourse Analysis of UN CERD State Reports, 1978–2023

Junki Nakahara, Gi-Wook Shin
article en

Abstract

This study examines racism “denial” in Asia through a critical discourse analysis of state reports submitted to the United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) by 16 Asian countries from 1978 to 2023. Our findings reveal that denial is not just a rhetorical tool for deflecting accusations but functions as a deeply embedded mechanism to justify and reinforce existing discrimination. Importantly, these state discourses are shaped by social, political, and religious values, as well as struggles for national liberation, unity, and security. By unpacking these layers in historically and comparatively informed ways, we identify and classify patterns of discursive denial—literal, interpretive, and ideological—with subcategories for each. This study not only adds to empirical inquiry into racisms in often neglected Asian contexts but also presents a conceptual framework for examining the diverse manifestations and articulations of race and racism, extending beyond the explanatory capacity of existing dominant theories of race developed through Western lenses.

Critical Sociology
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.