PUBLIC INTEREST AS A CATEGORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: THE NEED FOR DOCTRINAL RECONSIDERATION

The public interest in the system of administrative law is a fundamental concept that forms the legal foundation for the exercise of public authority and serves as a criterion for evaluating its actions. At the same time, despite the frequent use of this term in legislation, judicial practice, and administrative proceedings, the concept of public interest remains at the level of a declaration without clear substantive content [1, p. 5–20]. Its semantic ambiguity and simultaneous legal uncertainty create serious problems in the theory and practice of administrative law. In law enforcement activities, public interest is often used as a general justification for the actions of public authorities, even in cases where such actions limit or violate the rights of natural or legal persons. As a result, public administration bodies enjoy broad discretionary powers, which often leads to abuse or manipulation. The essence of the problem lies in the fact that public interest is not considered as a concretized legal category with defined characteristics and criteria for application, but rather as an abstract evaluative formula that each subject may interpret at their own discretion [2].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-09.05.2025.031
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PUBLIC INTEREST AS A CATEGORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: THE NEED FOR DOCTRINAL RECONSIDERATION

Maryna Kravets
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

PUBLIC INTEREST AS A CATEGORY OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: THE NEED FOR DOCTRINAL RECONSIDERATION

Maryna Kravets
article en

Abstract

The public interest in the system of administrative law is a fundamental concept that forms the legal foundation for the exercise of public authority and serves as a criterion for evaluating its actions. At the same time, despite the frequent use of this term in legislation, judicial practice, and administrative proceedings, the concept of public interest remains at the level of a declaration without clear substantive content [1, p. 5–20]. Its semantic ambiguity and simultaneous legal uncertainty create serious problems in the theory and practice of administrative law. In law enforcement activities, public interest is often used as a general justification for the actions of public authorities, even in cases where such actions limit or violate the rights of natural or legal persons. As a result, public administration bodies enjoy broad discretionary powers, which often leads to abuse or manipulation. The essence of the problem lies in the fact that public interest is not considered as a concretized legal category with defined characteristics and criteria for application, but rather as an abstract evaluative formula that each subject may interpret at their own discretion [2].

Dnipro University of Technology (UA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.