Triple Oxygen Isotope Analysis of Methanesulfonate Using the SO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup> Fragment in ESI-Orbitrap-MS
Atmospheric oxidation of dimethyl sulfide (DMS, CH<sub>3</sub>SCH<sub>3</sub>) to sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>) and methanesulfonate (MSA, CH<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) is a key process for the atmospheric sulfur cycle, particularly in remote marine regions. To better understand the DMS oxidation chemistry, oxygen isotope signatures (δ<sup>18</sup>O and Δ<sup>17</sup>O) serve as potential tracers for investigating the oxidation of DMS to MSA. However, conventional gas-source isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) is rarely used to measure the natural abundance isotopic compositions of MSA due to the requirement for micromole-level sample sizes and the complexity of the analytical steps. Here, a new method measuring δ<sup>18</sup>O and Δ<sup>17</sup>O values of MSA was developed using electrospray ionization Orbitrap mass spectrometry (ESI-Orbitrap-MS) with a dual-inlet system (4 reference and 3 sample blocks for 98 min on ∼13 nmol samples). Performing Δ<sup>17</sup>O measurements directly on CH<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> ions requires a high mass resolution of 120,000 (FWHM at <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> 200) to separate <sup>17</sup>O and <sup>13</sup>C isotopologues, which tends to increase analytical uncertainty compared to a lower mass resolution of 60,000. Therefore, we measured SO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> fragment ions derived from MSA while eliminating the -CH<sub>3</sub> group, enabling Δ<sup>17</sup>O analysis using a lower mass resolution setting of 60,000 and a higher scan speed (4 scans/s). A three-point calibration between our ESI-Orbitrap-MS measurements and conventional IRMS measurements shows that the standard deviations of the residuals from the regression lines were 1.0 and 0.4‰ for δ<sup>18</sup>O and Δ<sup>17</sup>O values, respectively. Overall, this new analytical method is more direct and sensitive than earlier approaches, providing access to more natural atmospheric and/or ice core samples.
Authors
- I. E. Kohl
- Yihang Hong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3677-8052)
- Zhenfei Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9659-1815)
- Tengyu Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3137-5898)
- Yongbo Peng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-5552)
- Shohei Hattori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4438-5462)
- Andreas Hilkert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-4540)
- Daniel R. Crocker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5297-1103)
- Wei Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-2008)
- David T. Johnston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2487-1084)
- Cajetan Neubauer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5348-5609)
- Yu Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-6761)
- Yu Wei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9409-8656)
- Hao Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3912-601X)
- Longchen Zhu
Institutions
- University of Utah (US)
- Harvard University Press (US)
- University of Colorado System (US)
- Thermo Fisher Scientific (Germany) (DE)
- Nanjing University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2025-06-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c01382
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.50
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities