The seductions and fallacies of misogynistic influencer culture: Looking through the lens of social bulimia

In recent years, educators, youth workers and professionals working in prevention of extremism roles have expressed serious concerns about the growing impact of online misogynist content on male adolescents. Via online portals and social media, a number of self-styled ‘influencers’, such as Andrew Tate, are melding patriarchal and sexist messages with promises of quick wealth, status and achievement of an ideal male body. Drawing from qualitative in-depth interviews with educators, practitioners involved in the safeguarding of young people and professionals involved in preventing extremism, in this article we excavate some of the key drivers that encourage participation in misogynistic culture for male adolescents. Deploying Jock Young’s concept of social bulimia we illuminate the attraction of male supremacist ideologies promoted by misogynistic influencers, whilst demonstrating the contradictory dynamics of simultaneous cultural inclusion and structural exclusion and the negative effects of turbulent experiences of ontological insecurity and precarity in contemporary society. In unravelling the gravitational pull of misogynist influencers for adolescent boys and young men, we present illustrative ‘bulimic applications’ as a mechanism for understanding the ideological mutuality between neo-liberal capitalist ideologies and misogynistic cultures. In emphasising the need to coalesce explanations for engagement with hateful online content that focus on individual vulnerabilities and susceptibilities with an appreciation of contextual and structural conditions, we explicate three illustrative applications: identity, technological cultures and ontological insecurity; aspirational capitalism and neoliberal ‘hustle culture’ , and knowledge and relative ‘truths’ . As we conclude, there is a disconcerting - but tangible - fit between capitalist neoliberal values and misogynistic beliefs that social media influencers seek to both exploit and nurture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crime Media Culture An International Journal
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590251351446
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The seductions and fallacies of misogynistic influencer culture: Looking through the lens of social bulimia

Gabe Mythen, Laura Naegler, Jacob Astley
1 citations
Crime Media Culture An International Journal
Gender, Feminism, and Media
3.87
article

The seductions and fallacies of misogynistic influencer culture: Looking through the lens of social bulimia

Gabe Mythen, Laura Naegler, Jacob Astley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, educators, youth workers and professionals working in prevention of extremism roles have expressed serious concerns about the growing impact of online misogynist content on male adolescents. Via online portals and social media, a number of self-styled ‘influencers’, such as Andrew Tate, are melding patriarchal and sexist messages with promises of quick wealth, status and achievement of an ideal male body. Drawing from qualitative in-depth interviews with educators, practitioners involved in the safeguarding of young people and professionals involved in preventing extremism, in this article we excavate some of the key drivers that encourage participation in misogynistic culture for male adolescents. Deploying Jock Young’s concept of social bulimia we illuminate the attraction of male supremacist ideologies promoted by misogynistic influencers, whilst demonstrating the contradictory dynamics of simultaneous cultural inclusion and structural exclusion and the negative effects of turbulent experiences of ontological insecurity and precarity in contemporary society. In unravelling the gravitational pull of misogynist influencers for adolescent boys and young men, we present illustrative ‘bulimic applications’ as a mechanism for understanding the ideological mutuality between neo-liberal capitalist ideologies and misogynistic cultures. In emphasising the need to coalesce explanations for engagement with hateful online content that focus on individual vulnerabilities and susceptibilities with an appreciation of contextual and structural conditions, we explicate three illustrative applications: identity, technological cultures and ontological insecurity; aspirational capitalism and neoliberal ‘hustle culture’ , and knowledge and relative ‘truths’ . As we conclude, there is a disconcerting - but tangible - fit between capitalist neoliberal values and misogynistic beliefs that social media influencers seek to both exploit and nurture.

Crime Media Culture An International Journal
University of Liverpool (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.