A two-step approach to simultaneously correct for selection and misclassification bias in nonprobability samples from hard-to-reach populations

Researchers studying hard-to-reach or minority populations are increasingly implementing nonprobability sampling strategies that are often prone to selection bias. To address this problem, existing statistical methods suggest integrating data from external probability sample, often collected by government agencies, with the nonprobability sample from the hard-to-reach population. These methods assume that all information collected in the probability sample is recorded without errors. This may not be the case if participants are unwilling to report their minority status, such as sexual orientation, truthfully in large-scale population-based surveys, leading to misclassification bias. In this paper, we propose a novel two-step approach aimed at addressing misclassification bias in the probability sample to improve the performance of the data integration methods aimed at addressing selection bias in the nonprobability sample. By applying the proposed method to simulated data, we demonstrate a significant reduction in bias and validate the proposed bootstrap variance estimator of the estimated mean (prevalence) under low, moderate, and high misclassification rates. This method is particularly beneficial when the misclassification rate is high. Finally, we illustrate the application of the two-step approach to estimate the prevalence of measures of social connectedness among sexual minority men using a real-world nonprobability sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf132
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A two-step approach to simultaneously correct for selection and misclassification bias in nonprobability samples from hard-to-reach populations

Travis Salway, Dionne Gesink, Michael Escobar, Peter Smith et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Census and Population Estimation
2.63
article

A two-step approach to simultaneously correct for selection and misclassification bias in nonprobability samples from hard-to-reach populations

Travis Salway, Dionne Gesink, Michael Escobar, Peter Smith, Victoria Landsman, Christoffer Dharma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Researchers studying hard-to-reach or minority populations are increasingly implementing nonprobability sampling strategies that are often prone to selection bias. To address this problem, existing statistical methods suggest integrating data from external probability sample, often collected by government agencies, with the nonprobability sample from the hard-to-reach population. These methods assume that all information collected in the probability sample is recorded without errors. This may not be the case if participants are unwilling to report their minority status, such as sexual orientation, truthfully in large-scale population-based surveys, leading to misclassification bias. In this paper, we propose a novel two-step approach aimed at addressing misclassification bias in the probability sample to improve the performance of the data integration methods aimed at addressing selection bias in the nonprobability sample. By applying the proposed method to simulated data, we demonstrate a significant reduction in bias and validate the proposed bootstrap variance estimator of the estimated mean (prevalence) under low, moderate, and high misclassification rates. This method is particularly beneficial when the misclassification rate is high. Finally, we illustrate the application of the two-step approach to estimate the prevalence of measures of social connectedness among sexual minority men using a real-world nonprobability sample.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(11)
3M (United States) (US), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Toronto (CA), BC Centre for Disease Control (CA), Monash Health (AU), Public Health Ontario (CA), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US), Institute for Work & Health (CA), Monash University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Census and Population Estimation
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.