COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ETHICAL INCIDENT APPROACHES IN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS UTILIZING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLM)

In this study, the response performances of generative artificial intelligence applications used in many different business areas to ethical situations were observed. It is important to carefully examine the responses produced by generative artificial intelligence applications with Large Language Model (LLM) in all business areas. In the study, the answers to sample ethical cases in the context of LLM were examined through 5 large generative artificial intelligence applications with LLM structure. The reasons, explanations, justification elements and interpretations given by Deepseek, ChatGpt 4o, QwenChat 2.5 Max, Gemini 2.0 Flash and Copilot applications were requested in their responses to ethical cases. According to the comparison results, the agreement and disagreement between the applications were also examined and the approaches of LLMs to ethical issues were revealed through the answers they gave. The reason for examining ethical cases in this study is that there is no absolute one-way answer to ethical cases. Ethical situation evaluations that vary from person to person are also a challenging problem area in terms of LLM applications. 13 sample ethical cases were explained and questions were asked to these 5 generative artificial intelligence applications without any prior preparation stage. In the answers received, generative artificial intelligence applications were asked to base them on and comment on them. As a result of the findings obtained, evaluations were made according to common points, differences, and general trends. These findings show that LLMs have made progress in addressing ethical issues. It has been observed that applications should continue to develop in producing consistent and fair solutions to ethical dilemmas. This situation emphasizes once again the importance of human control in the ethical decision-making processes of LLMs and the importance of the integration of ethical rules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mugla Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.1637684
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ETHICAL INCIDENT APPROACHES IN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS UTILIZING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLM)

Serdar Biroğul
Mugla Journal of Science and Technology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ETHICAL INCIDENT APPROACHES IN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS UTILIZING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLM)

Serdar Biroğul
article en

Abstract

In this study, the response performances of generative artificial intelligence applications used in many different business areas to ethical situations were observed. It is important to carefully examine the responses produced by generative artificial intelligence applications with Large Language Model (LLM) in all business areas. In the study, the answers to sample ethical cases in the context of LLM were examined through 5 large generative artificial intelligence applications with LLM structure. The reasons, explanations, justification elements and interpretations given by Deepseek, ChatGpt 4o, QwenChat 2.5 Max, Gemini 2.0 Flash and Copilot applications were requested in their responses to ethical cases. According to the comparison results, the agreement and disagreement between the applications were also examined and the approaches of LLMs to ethical issues were revealed through the answers they gave. The reason for examining ethical cases in this study is that there is no absolute one-way answer to ethical cases. Ethical situation evaluations that vary from person to person are also a challenging problem area in terms of LLM applications. 13 sample ethical cases were explained and questions were asked to these 5 generative artificial intelligence applications without any prior preparation stage. In the answers received, generative artificial intelligence applications were asked to base them on and comment on them. As a result of the findings obtained, evaluations were made according to common points, differences, and general trends. These findings show that LLMs have made progress in addressing ethical issues. It has been observed that applications should continue to develop in producing consistent and fair solutions to ethical dilemmas. This situation emphasizes once again the importance of human control in the ethical decision-making processes of LLMs and the importance of the integration of ethical rules.

Mugla Journal of Science and TechnologyVol. 11(1)
Düzce Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ETHICAL INCIDENT APPROACHES IN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS UTILIZING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLM) — Serdar Biroğul · Mugla Journal of Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS