Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence

The field of knowledge management and knowledge management systems is evolving and dynamic. In the era of developed information technology systems, the dynamics of knowledge creation and dissemination have also changed. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)—an embedded entity in the knowledge management system—has become a prominent area of research nowadays, while accountability, transparency, and ethics are common research agendas in institutional economics related to GenAI. The research in this paper has investigated the convictions behind GenAI adoption and how to develop a GenAI governance framework. The research adopts a qualitative approach to investigate the problem and surveys undergraduate students to explore their motive for using GenAI. The study sheds analytical light on institutional economists' view on the governance of GenAI. The study has found a positive relationship between perceived benefits and the adoption of GenAI in education by students. The theoretical model will have a considerable impact on the ongoing debate on the governance of GenAI and knowledge management systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Knowledge Management
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkm.383061
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Aznan Hasan
International Journal of Knowledge Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Aznan Hasan
article en

Abstract

The field of knowledge management and knowledge management systems is evolving and dynamic. In the era of developed information technology systems, the dynamics of knowledge creation and dissemination have also changed. Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)—an embedded entity in the knowledge management system—has become a prominent area of research nowadays, while accountability, transparency, and ethics are common research agendas in institutional economics related to GenAI. The research in this paper has investigated the convictions behind GenAI adoption and how to develop a GenAI governance framework. The research adopts a qualitative approach to investigate the problem and surveys undergraduate students to explore their motive for using GenAI. The study sheds analytical light on institutional economists' view on the governance of GenAI. The study has found a positive relationship between perceived benefits and the adoption of GenAI in education by students. The theoretical model will have a considerable impact on the ongoing debate on the governance of GenAI and knowledge management systems.

International Journal of Knowledge ManagementVol. 21(1)
Westminster International University in Tashkent (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence — Aznan Hasan · International Journal of Knowledge Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS