Expert Consensus‐Based Technical Guidelines for Remote Robotic‐Assisted Surgery and Procedures

Remote robotic-assisted surgery and procedures offer significant potential to enhance access to surgical expertise, optimize patient outcomes, improve healthcare efficiency, reduce costs, and increase patient and provider satisfaction, aligning with the quintuple aim. By mitigating geographic barriers, addressing surgical deserts, and reducing travel burdens for surgeons, patients, and their families, remote robotic-assisted surgery and procedures can substantially expand access to high-quality health care. The safe and effective implementation of remote procedures depends on the availability of robust, surgical-grade networks, reliable connectivity, and comprehensive cybersecurity measures to protect patient data. Seamless integration among remote-enabled robotic system interfaces, telepresence technologies, and facility-level infrastructure is essential to ensure operational reliability and procedural success. These technical guidelines define the fundamental technical requirements to support the design, implementation, and scaling of safe, effective, and interoperable remote robotic-assisted surgical and procedural programs. As the field evolves, guidelines will be updated to reflect technological advancements, specifications, and emerging best practices. Complementary clinical and operational practice guidelines will work synergistically with technical guidelines to support the global expansion and market adoption of remote programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgery
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12653
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert Consensus‐Based Technical Guidelines for Remote Robotic‐Assisted Surgery and Procedures

Marie Foley Kijewski, M. Buehler, Shane Farritor, Brian Miller et al.
10 citations
World Journal of Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
20.06
article

Expert Consensus‐Based Technical Guidelines for Remote Robotic‐Assisted Surgery and Procedures

Marie Foley Kijewski, M. Buehler, Shane Farritor, Brian Miller, Yulun Wang, Bill Peine, B Whitney, J. P. Bernard, Yuman Fong, Mike Yramategui
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Remote robotic-assisted surgery and procedures offer significant potential to enhance access to surgical expertise, optimize patient outcomes, improve healthcare efficiency, reduce costs, and increase patient and provider satisfaction, aligning with the quintuple aim. By mitigating geographic barriers, addressing surgical deserts, and reducing travel burdens for surgeons, patients, and their families, remote robotic-assisted surgery and procedures can substantially expand access to high-quality health care. The safe and effective implementation of remote procedures depends on the availability of robust, surgical-grade networks, reliable connectivity, and comprehensive cybersecurity measures to protect patient data. Seamless integration among remote-enabled robotic system interfaces, telepresence technologies, and facility-level infrastructure is essential to ensure operational reliability and procedural success. These technical guidelines define the fundamental technical requirements to support the design, implementation, and scaling of safe, effective, and interoperable remote robotic-assisted surgical and procedural programs. As the field evolves, guidelines will be updated to reflect technological advancements, specifications, and emerging best practices. Complementary clinical and operational practice guidelines will work synergistically with technical guidelines to support the global expansion and market adoption of remote programs.

World Journal of SurgeryVol. 49(7)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Medtronic (Ireland) (IE), Medtronic (United States) (US), City of Hope (US), Virtual Technology (United States) (US), Intuitive Surgical (United States) (US), Ashland (United States) (US)
University of Central Florida, Nova Southeastern University, Intuitive Surgical, Northwell Health, University of Ulsan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, MicroPort
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Surgical Simulation and Training
20.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.