Comparison of oral midazolam versus oral dexmedetomidine for ease of induction and prevention of emergence delirium in pediatric ent surgeries under sevoflurane anesthesia: a randomized controlled study

Background: Emergence delirium (ED) is a common and distressing complication in pediatric patients following sevoflurane anesthesia. Preoperative anxiety, rapid anaesthetic emergence and postoperative pain contribute to ED. Midazolam is widely used for premedication but has variable efficacy in preventing ED. Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2 agonist, offers sedative and analgesic properties with minimal respiratory depression. This study compared the efficacy of oral midazolam versus oral dexmedetomidine for ease of induction and prevention of ED in children undergoing ENT surgeries under sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial, 100 children aged 2–12 years (ASA I–II) scheduled for elective ENT surgeries were assigned to receive either oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (Group M) or oral dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg (Group D) 45 minutes before induction. Preoperative sedation, ease of parental separation, mask acceptance, hemodynamic stability, incidence of ED (assessed using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale) and recovery profiles were recorded. Results: Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Group D demonstrated significantly better preoperative sedation (RSS 3.6 vs 2.8, p<0.001), easier parental separation (90% vs 74%, p=0.03) and superior mask acceptance (88% vs 70%, p=0.02). The incidence of ED was significantly lower in Group D (8%) compared to Group M (26%, p=0.01). PACU discharge was earlier in Group D (36.5 vs 42.8 minutes, p=0.04). Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in both groups without significant adverse events. Conclusions: Oral dexmedetomidine provides superior preoperative sedation, smoother induction and significantly reduces emergence delirium compared to oral midazolam in children undergoing ENT surgeries under sevoflurane anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine may be considered a preferred premedication option in pediatric anesthesia practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20252024
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of oral midazolam versus oral dexmedetomidine for ease of induction and prevention of emergence delirium in pediatric ent surgeries under sevoflurane anesthesia: a randomized controlled study

Kamal Fotedar, Punit Mehta, Pooja Singh, Sanjay Sachdeva et al.
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Comparison of oral midazolam versus oral dexmedetomidine for ease of induction and prevention of emergence delirium in pediatric ent surgeries under sevoflurane anesthesia: a randomized controlled study

Kamal Fotedar, Punit Mehta, Pooja Singh, Sanjay Sachdeva, Abinash Panigrahi
article en

Abstract

Background: Emergence delirium (ED) is a common and distressing complication in pediatric patients following sevoflurane anesthesia. Preoperative anxiety, rapid anaesthetic emergence and postoperative pain contribute to ED. Midazolam is widely used for premedication but has variable efficacy in preventing ED. Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2 agonist, offers sedative and analgesic properties with minimal respiratory depression. This study compared the efficacy of oral midazolam versus oral dexmedetomidine for ease of induction and prevention of ED in children undergoing ENT surgeries under sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial, 100 children aged 2–12 years (ASA I–II) scheduled for elective ENT surgeries were assigned to receive either oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (Group M) or oral dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg (Group D) 45 minutes before induction. Preoperative sedation, ease of parental separation, mask acceptance, hemodynamic stability, incidence of ED (assessed using the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale) and recovery profiles were recorded. Results: Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Group D demonstrated significantly better preoperative sedation (RSS 3.6 vs 2.8, p<0.001), easier parental separation (90% vs 74%, p=0.03) and superior mask acceptance (88% vs 70%, p=0.02). The incidence of ED was significantly lower in Group D (8%) compared to Group M (26%, p=0.01). PACU discharge was earlier in Group D (36.5 vs 42.8 minutes, p=0.04). Hemodynamic parameters remained stable in both groups without significant adverse events. Conclusions: Oral dexmedetomidine provides superior preoperative sedation, smoother induction and significantly reduces emergence delirium compared to oral midazolam in children undergoing ENT surgeries under sevoflurane anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine may be considered a preferred premedication option in pediatric anesthesia practice.

International Journal of Research in Medical SciencesVol. 13(7)
Max Super Speciality Hospital (IN), BLK Super Speciality Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.