Unequal Priorities: How Intra-household Resource Allocation and Means-tested Benefits Affect Capabilities in poor Families

Abstract Means-tested welfare is usually provided at the household level. However, resources are not necessarily shared equally among household members. Benefits may thus have different effects on individuals depending on their position in the household. Based on interviews with twenty-four poor families in Switzerland and drawing on the capability approach, this article analyzes how practices of intra-household resource sharing interact with the design of social assistance and NGO benefits in shaping capabilities. Women in couples tend to be disadvantaged in resource distribution, but due to joint eligibility with their partners, it can be difficult for them to access benefits. Children and younger adults are favored by intergenerational redistribution, especially regarding their opportunities for education and participation. Moreover, NGO benefits are more easily available for children, whereas young adults are favored by their independent eligibility for benefits. The article concludes that independently accessible benefits would improve the capabilities of women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaf030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unequal Priorities: How Intra-household Resource Allocation and Means-tested Benefits Affect Capabilities in poor Families

Anna Gonon
1 citations
Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
3.87
article

Unequal Priorities: How Intra-household Resource Allocation and Means-tested Benefits Affect Capabilities in poor Families

Anna Gonon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Means-tested welfare is usually provided at the household level. However, resources are not necessarily shared equally among household members. Benefits may thus have different effects on individuals depending on their position in the household. Based on interviews with twenty-four poor families in Switzerland and drawing on the capability approach, this article analyzes how practices of intra-household resource sharing interact with the design of social assistance and NGO benefits in shaping capabilities. Women in couples tend to be disadvantaged in resource distribution, but due to joint eligibility with their partners, it can be difficult for them to access benefits. Children and younger adults are favored by intergenerational redistribution, especially regarding their opportunities for education and participation. Moreover, NGO benefits are more easily available for children, whereas young adults are favored by their independent eligibility for benefits. The article concludes that independently accessible benefits would improve the capabilities of women.

Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.