Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Social Competencies for Undergraduate Students

Aim. This study aimed to develop and validate a social competencies scale (SOCS) for undergraduate students and examine the mean differences in SOCS across gender and family income. Methods. This cross-sectional study comprised six stages. Stage I: Items Generation and Selection, the initial SOCS was constructed through literature reviews. Stage II: Expert Reviewing, the items were further reviewed by experts to ensure content validity, clarity, and alignment with theoretical constructs. Stage III: Pilot Study, a pilot study was conducted with 20 undergraduate students. Feedback from this study was used to refine the wording and structure of the items. Stage IV: Construction of SOCS, this survey was administered to students from 15 universities in Thailand using a 5-point Likert scale. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on responses from 955 students to identify the structure of SOCS. Stage V: Scale Validation, the SOCS measurement model was tested for reliability and construct validity using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Stage VI: Comparison of Means Difference, independent t-test and ANOVA were conducted to compare mean differences in SOCS. Results. The final SOCS model included six latent factors: self-responsibility (SRS), social relationships (REL), self-awareness (AWR), teamwork-building (TWB), social networking (NET), and communication (COM). The second-order CFA of SOCS fits the data adequately. Female students scored higher on SRS, REL, TWB, and COM, indicating significant gender differences but there was not significantly impacted by family income. Conclusions. The results of this study demonstrated the basic psychometric properties of a new questionnaire to measure social competencies for undergraduate students that can be applied in similar contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Culture and Society
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15503/10.15503.jecs2025.2.535.553
Primary Topic
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Social Competencies for Undergraduate Students

Buratin Khampirat, Dissakoon Chonsalasin, Phanommas Bamrungsin, Kwanruan Pusaboon
Journal of Education Culture and Society
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
article

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Social Competencies for Undergraduate Students

Buratin Khampirat, Dissakoon Chonsalasin, Phanommas Bamrungsin, Kwanruan Pusaboon
article en

Abstract

Aim. This study aimed to develop and validate a social competencies scale (SOCS) for undergraduate students and examine the mean differences in SOCS across gender and family income. Methods. This cross-sectional study comprised six stages. Stage I: Items Generation and Selection, the initial SOCS was constructed through literature reviews. Stage II: Expert Reviewing, the items were further reviewed by experts to ensure content validity, clarity, and alignment with theoretical constructs. Stage III: Pilot Study, a pilot study was conducted with 20 undergraduate students. Feedback from this study was used to refine the wording and structure of the items. Stage IV: Construction of SOCS, this survey was administered to students from 15 universities in Thailand using a 5-point Likert scale. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed on responses from 955 students to identify the structure of SOCS. Stage V: Scale Validation, the SOCS measurement model was tested for reliability and construct validity using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Stage VI: Comparison of Means Difference, independent t-test and ANOVA were conducted to compare mean differences in SOCS. Results. The final SOCS model included six latent factors: self-responsibility (SRS), social relationships (REL), self-awareness (AWR), teamwork-building (TWB), social networking (NET), and communication (COM). The second-order CFA of SOCS fits the data adequately. Female students scored higher on SRS, REL, TWB, and COM, indicating significant gender differences but there was not significantly impacted by family income. Conclusions. The results of this study demonstrated the basic psychometric properties of a new questionnaire to measure social competencies for undergraduate students that can be applied in similar contexts.

Journal of Education Culture and SocietyVol. 16(1)
Rajamangala University of Technology Isan (TH), Mahamakut Buddhist University (TH), Suranaree University of Technology (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.