Evaluating the Relationship Between Migraine and Cognitive Function by Using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)

Background: Migraine is recognized as one of the most prevalent disorders worldwide. Previous imaging studies suggest some structural changes in the brains of migraine patients. Studies investigating the relationship between migraine and cognition have shown conflicting results. Objectives: The present study aims to evaluate the association between migraine and cognitive function using the frontal assessment battery (FAB) test. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 96 participants, including 48 migraine patients and 48 healthy subjects, were recruited. Migraine was diagnosed and classified as migraine without aura (MO) and migraine with aura (MA), based on the international classification of headache disorders, third edition (ICHD-3). All participants were interviewed, and demographic and migraine-specific variables (duration of the disease, frequency of the disease, severity of headaches, preventive medication use) were collected. Cognitive function was then assessed using the FAB, a validated tool for assessing frontal lobe cognitive functions. Results: Of the 48 migraine patients, 10 were diagnosed with MA, and 38 were diagnosed with MO. The FAB results were significantly lower in migraine patients compared to controls (median ± [interquartile range (IQR)]: 15.00 [4.00] vs. 16.00 [3.75], P-value = 0.04). Furthermore, patients with MO (14.00 [5.00]) had significantly lower FAB scores than the control group (P-value = 0.01). No significant differences were observed between patients with MA and either the control group (15.50 [1.50], P-value = 0.82) or MO patients (P-value = 0.09). Additionally, a moderate positive correlation between FAB scores and years of education (r = 0.54, P-value < 0.001) and mild negative correlations with age (r = -0.32, P-value < 0.001) and Body Mass Index (BMI) (r = -0.35, P-value < 0.001) were observed. No significant associations were found between FAB scores and sex, smoking, drinking, or migraine-specific variables. Conclusions: The present study suggests that a history of migraine, especially MO, could worsen cognitive function. However, we cannot specify the relationship between MA and cognition, nor its differences with MO. Additionally cognition could have a moderate positive correlation with years of education and a mild negative correlation with age and BMI. Moreover, disease duration, frequency, severity, or preventive medication use did not have a significant impact on cognitive performance in migraine patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Neuroscience
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/ans-152406
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Relationship Between Migraine and Cognitive Function by Using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)

Ali Bitaraf, Abbas Tafakhori, SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi, Sakineh Ranji‐Burachaloo et al.
Archives of Neuroscience
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

Evaluating the Relationship Between Migraine and Cognitive Function by Using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)

Ali Bitaraf, Abbas Tafakhori, SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi, Sakineh Ranji‐Burachaloo, Mohammad Ali Shadram
article en

Abstract

Background: Migraine is recognized as one of the most prevalent disorders worldwide. Previous imaging studies suggest some structural changes in the brains of migraine patients. Studies investigating the relationship between migraine and cognition have shown conflicting results. Objectives: The present study aims to evaluate the association between migraine and cognitive function using the frontal assessment battery (FAB) test. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 96 participants, including 48 migraine patients and 48 healthy subjects, were recruited. Migraine was diagnosed and classified as migraine without aura (MO) and migraine with aura (MA), based on the international classification of headache disorders, third edition (ICHD-3). All participants were interviewed, and demographic and migraine-specific variables (duration of the disease, frequency of the disease, severity of headaches, preventive medication use) were collected. Cognitive function was then assessed using the FAB, a validated tool for assessing frontal lobe cognitive functions. Results: Of the 48 migraine patients, 10 were diagnosed with MA, and 38 were diagnosed with MO. The FAB results were significantly lower in migraine patients compared to controls (median ± [interquartile range (IQR)]: 15.00 [4.00] vs. 16.00 [3.75], P-value = 0.04). Furthermore, patients with MO (14.00 [5.00]) had significantly lower FAB scores than the control group (P-value = 0.01). No significant differences were observed between patients with MA and either the control group (15.50 [1.50], P-value = 0.82) or MO patients (P-value = 0.09). Additionally, a moderate positive correlation between FAB scores and years of education (r = 0.54, P-value < 0.001) and mild negative correlations with age (r = -0.32, P-value < 0.001) and Body Mass Index (BMI) (r = -0.35, P-value < 0.001) were observed. No significant associations were found between FAB scores and sex, smoking, drinking, or migraine-specific variables. Conclusions: The present study suggests that a history of migraine, especially MO, could worsen cognitive function. However, we cannot specify the relationship between MA and cognition, nor its differences with MO. Additionally cognition could have a moderate positive correlation with years of education and a mild negative correlation with age and BMI. Moreover, disease duration, frequency, severity, or preventive medication use did not have a significant impact on cognitive performance in migraine patients.

Archives of NeuroscienceVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.