Evaluation model for human error response training

Currently, many companies provide human error response training. The objective of this training is to gain knowledge about human error, participate in safety activities on their own, and make use of this knowledge in actual workplaces. However, many companies do not properly measure the effectiveness of education. Therefore, this study examined the creation of a model that can evaluate the effectiveness of human error response education. We created a new questionnaire tool by referring to engagement surveys currently conducted in various companies and questionnaires that measure the personality of individual characteristics. We then conducted a questionnaire at an IT company that conducts human error response education and attempts to measure its effectiveness in terms of exercise scores. Multiple regression analysis was conducted based on the results of the questionnaire and the exercise scores, and a model was created to enable measurement of the effectiveness of the education. In this study, we were able to find clues for creating an evaluation index to measure the effectiveness of human error response education. However, the measurement of effectiveness was unclear in some cases, and issues remained regarding the accuracy of the measurement. Once this model is established, it is expected that companies that have not yet been able to measure the effectiveness of their human error response training will be able to do so by using a simple questionnaire. Based on the results of this study, we plan to further expand the data and create an evaluation index that will enable more accurate measurement of the effectiveness of education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006288
Primary Topic
Marine and Coastal Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation model for human error response training

Y. Banno, Yusaku Okada, Yu Shibuya
AHFE international
Marine and Coastal Research
article

Evaluation model for human error response training

Y. Banno, Yusaku Okada, Yu Shibuya
article en

Abstract

Currently, many companies provide human error response training. The objective of this training is to gain knowledge about human error, participate in safety activities on their own, and make use of this knowledge in actual workplaces. However, many companies do not properly measure the effectiveness of education. Therefore, this study examined the creation of a model that can evaluate the effectiveness of human error response education. We created a new questionnaire tool by referring to engagement surveys currently conducted in various companies and questionnaires that measure the personality of individual characteristics. We then conducted a questionnaire at an IT company that conducts human error response education and attempts to measure its effectiveness in terms of exercise scores. Multiple regression analysis was conducted based on the results of the questionnaire and the exercise scores, and a model was created to enable measurement of the effectiveness of the education. In this study, we were able to find clues for creating an evaluation index to measure the effectiveness of human error response education. However, the measurement of effectiveness was unclear in some cases, and issues remained regarding the accuracy of the measurement. Once this model is established, it is expected that companies that have not yet been able to measure the effectiveness of their human error response training will be able to do so by using a simple questionnaire. Based on the results of this study, we plan to further expand the data and create an evaluation index that will enable more accurate measurement of the effectiveness of education.

AHFE internationalVol. 173
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Marine and Coastal Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.