Resolving Conflicts Between PSIRT and Safety Teams: A Collaborative Approach

The need to meet safety and security simultaneously is increasing in industrial control systems (ICS) and industrial robots, where network connectivity is rapidly expanding. However, the "safety first" culture that has taken root in many companies has put security requirements on the back burner, and there is a structure prone to conflicts between the two domains. In this study, the authors elucidate the conflict factors in the safety and security life cycle and propose a new collaborative framework based on the knowledge creation theory (SECI model, Ba, knowledge assets) of Nonaka et al. We conducted semi-structured interviews and qualitative analysis of five Japanese Industrial product suppliers. In the interview, we highlighted potential and actual conflicts between the product safety and security teams (e.g., PSIRT: Product Security Incident Response Team). In this paper, we proposed a resolution model for conflicts by dealing with cultural and cognitive gaps among experts from the perspective of human factors. We hope this model improves risk management in various industries and under cybersecurity laws and regulations amid tight regulations worldwide, such as the EU Cyber Resilience Act.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006144
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving Conflicts Between PSIRT and Safety Teams: A Collaborative Approach

Ichiro Koshijima, Kenji Watanabe, R. Oka, Jumpei Tahara
AHFE international
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Resolving Conflicts Between PSIRT and Safety Teams: A Collaborative Approach

Ichiro Koshijima, Kenji Watanabe, R. Oka, Jumpei Tahara
article en

Abstract

The need to meet safety and security simultaneously is increasing in industrial control systems (ICS) and industrial robots, where network connectivity is rapidly expanding. However, the "safety first" culture that has taken root in many companies has put security requirements on the back burner, and there is a structure prone to conflicts between the two domains. In this study, the authors elucidate the conflict factors in the safety and security life cycle and propose a new collaborative framework based on the knowledge creation theory (SECI model, Ba, knowledge assets) of Nonaka et al. We conducted semi-structured interviews and qualitative analysis of five Japanese Industrial product suppliers. In the interview, we highlighted potential and actual conflicts between the product safety and security teams (e.g., PSIRT: Product Security Incident Response Team). In this paper, we proposed a resolution model for conflicts by dealing with cultural and cognitive gaps among experts from the perspective of human factors. We hope this model improves risk management in various industries and under cybersecurity laws and regulations amid tight regulations worldwide, such as the EU Cyber Resilience Act.

AHFE internationalVol. 168
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resolving Conflicts Between PSIRT and Safety Teams: A Collaborative Approach — Ichiro Koshijima, Kenji Watanabe, et al. · AHFE international (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS