The Impact of Four Field of View Conditions on Team Marksmanship Performance Using a Team Shooting Scenario (TSS) Task

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of four field of view (FOV) conditions on three-person team’s marksmanship performance in terms of aiming time, accuracy, precision, and targets hit using a Team Shooting Scenario (TSS) task developed by the U.S. Army. Forty-eight soldiers from the South Carolina National Guard participated. The FOV restrictors included two monocular (41o and 78o) and two binocular (129o and 150o) restrictors. Soldiers were tasked with discriminating between distractors and threats (“T”), using the TSS’s 28 light boxes around a circle with a 15m diameter. Three of the four test variables were significantly different based on FOV condition; accuracy, precision, and hits significantly varied, while aiming time did not. For accuracy, the smaller the FOV, the better the performance. FOV was a statistically significant predictor of precision in the smallest and largest FOV conditions when using the quadratic effect where an inverted U-shape demonstrates greater precision. The greatest number of targets hit for both the linear and quadratic effects increase as FOV decreases. To provide guidance on optimal future head mounted devices needed for teams of soldiers during combat related tasks, it is critical to have team-based data to assess soldier performance and the effect of FOV on performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006028
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Four Field of View Conditions on Team Marksmanship Performance Using a Team Shooting Scenario (TSS) Task

Jose Villa, Patrick J. Rosopa, Elizabeth Perry, William Cox et al.
AHFE international
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

The Impact of Four Field of View Conditions on Team Marksmanship Performance Using a Team Shooting Scenario (TSS) Task

Jose Villa, Patrick J. Rosopa, Elizabeth Perry, William Cox, Daniel Greco, Blake Mitchell, Peioneti Lam, Todd Shealy, Casey Jenkins, Johnell O. Brooks, Joan S. Grant, Kevin J Pritchett, Edward J. Hennessy, Matthew J. Morris, Franklin Rice, Joshua S. Roper, Linda De Simone, Patrik Schuler, Samuel Blankenship, T. Warren, Rebecca Pool, Megan Gilstrap, Amanda Meldzuk, Braden Hudgins, Paul Riebe
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of four field of view (FOV) conditions on three-person team’s marksmanship performance in terms of aiming time, accuracy, precision, and targets hit using a Team Shooting Scenario (TSS) task developed by the U.S. Army. Forty-eight soldiers from the South Carolina National Guard participated. The FOV restrictors included two monocular (41o and 78o) and two binocular (129o and 150o) restrictors. Soldiers were tasked with discriminating between distractors and threats (“T”), using the TSS’s 28 light boxes around a circle with a 15m diameter. Three of the four test variables were significantly different based on FOV condition; accuracy, precision, and hits significantly varied, while aiming time did not. For accuracy, the smaller the FOV, the better the performance. FOV was a statistically significant predictor of precision in the smallest and largest FOV conditions when using the quadratic effect where an inverted U-shape demonstrates greater precision. The greatest number of targets hit for both the linear and quadratic effects increase as FOV decreases. To provide guidance on optimal future head mounted devices needed for teams of soldiers during combat related tasks, it is critical to have team-based data to assess soldier performance and the effect of FOV on performance.

AHFE internationalVol. 162
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.