The Algorithmic Fairness Challenge in Decision-Making

The increasing use of automated decision-making systems has given rise to concerns about fairness. This paper examines the major principles of fairness in decision-making, and it discusses the challenges of implementing fairness principles in practice, such as the trade-offs between different types of fairness and the difficulty of measuring fairness. Finally, the paper puts forward several proposals for promoting fairness in decision-making. These include the use of transparent and explainable algorithms, the involvement of stakeholders in the design of decision-making systems, and the establishment of accountability mechanisms. It is of the utmost importance that fairness is a fundamental principle in decision-making processes. This approach is designed to ensure that individuals facing similar circumstances are treated equally and not subjected to discrimination. Examples of unfair decision-making include situations where individuals are discriminated against based on protected attributes such as race, gender, or age. Decisions that lack transparency in their process may be perceived as biased or unjust. Unfairness can arise in a number of ways, for example when promotions are based on favouritism rather than merit, or when hiring decisions are influenced by personal biases rather than qualifications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006103
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Algorithmic Fairness Challenge in Decision-Making

Lucas Paletta, Gustavo Vieira, Herwig Zeiner
AHFE international
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Algorithmic Fairness Challenge in Decision-Making

Lucas Paletta, Gustavo Vieira, Herwig Zeiner
article en

Abstract

The increasing use of automated decision-making systems has given rise to concerns about fairness. This paper examines the major principles of fairness in decision-making, and it discusses the challenges of implementing fairness principles in practice, such as the trade-offs between different types of fairness and the difficulty of measuring fairness. Finally, the paper puts forward several proposals for promoting fairness in decision-making. These include the use of transparent and explainable algorithms, the involvement of stakeholders in the design of decision-making systems, and the establishment of accountability mechanisms. It is of the utmost importance that fairness is a fundamental principle in decision-making processes. This approach is designed to ensure that individuals facing similar circumstances are treated equally and not subjected to discrimination. Examples of unfair decision-making include situations where individuals are discriminated against based on protected attributes such as race, gender, or age. Decisions that lack transparency in their process may be perceived as biased or unjust. Unfairness can arise in a number of ways, for example when promotions are based on favouritism rather than merit, or when hiring decisions are influenced by personal biases rather than qualifications.

AHFE internationalVol. 165
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.