Digital Human Modeling for Naval Aviation: Past, Present, and Future

Digital Human Modeling (DHM) has been used to inform U.S. Navy (USN) aircraft acquisition programs such as F-35, CH-53K, and others for decades. Historically, the primary focus of Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division’s (NAWCAD) DHM efforts has been anthropometric accommodation (reach, vision, clearances) for aircrew and aircraft maintainers. A variety DHM applications (e.g., SAFEWORK/Delmia/Envision, RAMSIS, Jack/Process Simulate Human, Santos) have been used by Department of Defense (DoD) subject matter experts and/or aircraft manufacturers. DoD contributions to DHM capabilities have included software development, validation, and the development of multivariate use cases for inclusion in requirements specifications and related modeling efforts. Use of DHM is essential for evaluation of design early in the acquisition lifecycle to reduce cost and development time, however, there are a number of limitations that can impact modeling fidelity that must acknowledged. Examples include a lack of representative anthropometric data and manikins, users with no previous Human Factors and Ergonomics exposure/expertise, users with little understanding of aircrew and maintainer operations and environment, and modeling evaluations relying on guesswork regarding positioning and posture of manikins without accurately representing factors like cushion compression, flesh compression, aircrew clothing and equipment, postural variation, and restraint systems. Although acute injury risk due to crash or ejection has been successfully modeled for many years, recent Fleet requirements indicate the need to predict the risk of chronic musculoskeletal pain/injury as well. A variety of efforts to develop biomechanical modeling applications and assessments of ergonomics tools in commercially available DHM applications are currently underway to support ongoing initiatives. An architectural framework supporting integration of current and future human modeling software is in development. A collaborative U.S. Air Force and USN project to collect empirical data on fully equipped personnel in a variety of aircraft seating to develop posture models, support DHM tool development, and improve modeling fidelity is also underway. Proposed future efforts include development of a variety of publicly available modeling tools to include: parametric accommodation models, head and hand models, shape models, and poseable parametric finite element human models that use USN/USMC aircrew, aviator, and general population databases and 3D scan data to allow accurate representation of distinct populations. This presentation will document the DHM journey for Naval Aviation, highlighting past, present, and future efforts of NAWCAD and their collaborators.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AHFE international
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1006029
Primary Topic
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Human Modeling for Naval Aviation: Past, Present, and Future

Barry S. Shender, Andrew Koch, Lori Basham, Bethany L. Shivers et al.
AHFE international
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
article

Digital Human Modeling for Naval Aviation: Past, Present, and Future

Barry S. Shender, Andrew Koch, Lori Basham, Bethany L. Shivers, Kenneth Ritchey
article en

Abstract

Digital Human Modeling (DHM) has been used to inform U.S. Navy (USN) aircraft acquisition programs such as F-35, CH-53K, and others for decades. Historically, the primary focus of Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division’s (NAWCAD) DHM efforts has been anthropometric accommodation (reach, vision, clearances) for aircrew and aircraft maintainers. A variety DHM applications (e.g., SAFEWORK/Delmia/Envision, RAMSIS, Jack/Process Simulate Human, Santos) have been used by Department of Defense (DoD) subject matter experts and/or aircraft manufacturers. DoD contributions to DHM capabilities have included software development, validation, and the development of multivariate use cases for inclusion in requirements specifications and related modeling efforts. Use of DHM is essential for evaluation of design early in the acquisition lifecycle to reduce cost and development time, however, there are a number of limitations that can impact modeling fidelity that must acknowledged. Examples include a lack of representative anthropometric data and manikins, users with no previous Human Factors and Ergonomics exposure/expertise, users with little understanding of aircrew and maintainer operations and environment, and modeling evaluations relying on guesswork regarding positioning and posture of manikins without accurately representing factors like cushion compression, flesh compression, aircrew clothing and equipment, postural variation, and restraint systems. Although acute injury risk due to crash or ejection has been successfully modeled for many years, recent Fleet requirements indicate the need to predict the risk of chronic musculoskeletal pain/injury as well. A variety of efforts to develop biomechanical modeling applications and assessments of ergonomics tools in commercially available DHM applications are currently underway to support ongoing initiatives. An architectural framework supporting integration of current and future human modeling software is in development. A collaborative U.S. Air Force and USN project to collect empirical data on fully equipped personnel in a variety of aircraft seating to develop posture models, support DHM tool development, and improve modeling fidelity is also underway. Proposed future efforts include development of a variety of publicly available modeling tools to include: parametric accommodation models, head and hand models, shape models, and poseable parametric finite element human models that use USN/USMC aircrew, aviator, and general population databases and 3D scan data to allow accurate representation of distinct populations. This presentation will document the DHM journey for Naval Aviation, highlighting past, present, and future efforts of NAWCAD and their collaborators.

AHFE internationalVol. 162
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.